Volumetric flow rate.
Hectoliters per Millisecond to Megaliters per Fortnight Converter — hL/ms to ML/fn
Convert Hectoliter per Millisecond (hL/ms) to Megaliter per Fortnight (ML/fn) using the exact conversion factor (1 hectoliter per millisecond = 120,960 megaliter per fortnight). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Hectoliters per Millisecond to Megaliters per Fortnight converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 100 / 0.0008267195767.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Hectoliters per Millisecond to Megaliters per Fortnight
Hectoliter per Millisecond and Megaliter per Fortnight both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
megaliters per fortnight = hectoliters per millisecond × 120960
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 hectoliter per millisecond equals 100 base units, and 1 megaliter per fortnight equals 0.00082671957672 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct hectoliter per millisecond-to-megaliter per fortnight factor of 120960.
Simple example
1 hL/ms × 120960 = 120,960 ML/fn
1 hectoliter per millisecond = 120,960 megaliters per fortnight.
Real-world example
60 hL/ms × 120960 = 7,257,600 ML/fn
60 hectoliters per millisecond = 7,257,600 megaliters per fortnight.
Conversion table
| Hectoliter per Millisecond (hL/ms) | Megaliter per Fortnight (ML/fn) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 hL/ms | 12,096 ML/fn |
| 1 hL/ms | 120,960 ML/fn |
| 10 hL/ms | 1,209,600 ML/fn |
| 60 hL/ms | 7,257,600 ML/fn |
| 100 hL/ms | 12,096,000 ML/fn |
| 1,000 hL/ms | 120,960,000 ML/fn |
Reverse conversion: Megaliter per Fortnight to Hectoliter per Millisecond
1 ML/fn × 0.000008267195767 = 0.0000082672 hL/ms
1 megaliter per fortnight = 0.0000082672 hectoliters per millisecond.
hectoliters per millisecond = megaliters per fortnight × 0.0000082671957672
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Megaliter per Fortnight to Hectoliter per Millisecond.
Understanding the Hectoliter per Millisecond (hL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Megaliter per Fortnight (ML/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many megaliters per fortnight are in 1 hectoliter per millisecond?
1 hectoliter per millisecond equals 120,960 megaliters per fortnight, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert hectoliter per millisecond to megaliter per fortnight?
Multiply the hectoliter per millisecond value by 120960. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert megaliter per fortnight back to hectoliter per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 megaliter per fortnight equals 0.0000082672 hectoliters per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a hectoliter per millisecond?
Hectoliter per Millisecond (hL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a megaliter per fortnight?
Megaliter per Fortnight (ML/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the hectoliter per millisecond to megaliter per fortnight conversion exact?
Yes. Both hectoliter per millisecond and megaliter per fortnight are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 120960 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.