Volumetric flow rate.
Hectoliter per Minutes to Bushels per Millisecond Converter — hL/min to bu/ms
Convert Hectoliter per Minutes (hL/min) to Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 hectoliter per minutes = 0.000047296 bushel per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Hectoliter per Minutes to Bushels per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.001666666667 / 35.23907017.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Hectoliter per Minutes to Bushels per Millisecond
Hectoliter per Minutes and Bushel per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
bushels per millisecond = hectoliter per minutes × 0.000047295988764
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 hectoliter per minutes equals 0.00166666666667 base units, and 1 bushel per millisecond equals 35.2390701669 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct hectoliter per minutes-to-bushel per millisecond factor of 0.000047295988764.
Simple example
1 hL/min × 0.00004729598876 = 0.000047296 bu/ms
1 hectoliter per minutes = 0.000047296 bushels per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 hL/min × 0.00004729598876 = 0.0028377593 bu/ms
60 hectoliter per minutes = 0.0028377593 bushels per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Hectoliter per Minutes (hL/min) | Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 hL/min | 0.0000047296 bu/ms |
| 1 hL/min | 0.000047296 bu/ms |
| 10 hL/min | 0.0004729599 bu/ms |
| 60 hL/min | 0.0028377593 bu/ms |
| 100 hL/min | 0.0047295989 bu/ms |
| 1,000 hL/min | 0.0472959888 bu/ms |
Reverse conversion: Bushel per Millisecond to Hectoliter per Minutes
0.000047296 bu/ms × 21143.4421 = 1.000000238 hL/min
0.000047296 bushels per millisecond = 1.000000238 hectoliter per minutes.
hectoliter per minutes = bushels per millisecond × 21143.4421001
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Bushel per Millisecond to Hectoliter per Minutes.
Understanding the Hectoliter per Minutes (hL/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many bushels per millisecond are in 1 hectoliter per minutes?
1 hectoliter per minutes equals 0.000047296 bushels per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert hectoliter per minutes to bushel per millisecond?
Multiply the hectoliter per minutes value by 0.00004729598876. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert bushel per millisecond back to hectoliter per minutes?
Use the reverse factor: 1 bushel per millisecond equals 21,143.4421 hectoliter per minutes. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a hectoliter per minutes?
Hectoliter per Minutes (hL/min) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a bushel per millisecond?
Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the hectoliter per minutes to bushel per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both hectoliter per minutes and bushel per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00004729598876 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.