Volumetric flow rate.
Hectoliter per Minutes to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds Converter — hL/min to cm3/s
Convert Hectoliter per Minutes (hL/min) to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 hectoliter per minutes = 1,666.666667 cubic centimeter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Hectoliter per Minutes to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.001666666667 / 1e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Hectoliter per Minutes to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds
Hectoliter per Minutes and Cubic Centimeter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeter per seconds = hectoliter per minutes × 1666.66666667
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 hectoliter per minutes equals 0.00166666666667 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per seconds equals 0.000001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct hectoliter per minutes-to-cubic centimeter per seconds factor of 1666.66666667.
Simple example
1 hL/min × 1666.666667 = 1,666.666667 cm3/s
1 hectoliter per minutes = 1,666.666667 cubic centimeter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 hL/min × 1666.666667 = 100,000 cm3/s
60 hectoliter per minutes = 100,000 cubic centimeter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Hectoliter per Minutes (hL/min) | Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 hL/min | 166.6666667 cm3/s |
| 1 hL/min | 1,666.666667 cm3/s |
| 10 hL/min | 16,666.66667 cm3/s |
| 60 hL/min | 100,000 cm3/s |
| 100 hL/min | 166,666.6667 cm3/s |
| 1,000 hL/min | 1,666,666.667 cm3/s |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Hectoliter per Minutes
1 cm3/s × 0.0006 = 0.0006 hL/min
1 cubic centimeter per seconds = 0.0006 hectoliter per minutes.
hectoliter per minutes = cubic centimeter per seconds × 0.0006
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Hectoliter per Minutes.
Understanding the Hectoliter per Minutes (hL/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeter per seconds are in 1 hectoliter per minutes?
1 hectoliter per minutes equals 1,666.666667 cubic centimeter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert hectoliter per minutes to cubic centimeter per seconds?
Multiply the hectoliter per minutes value by 1666.666667. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per seconds back to hectoliter per minutes?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per seconds equals 0.0006 hectoliter per minutes. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a hectoliter per minutes?
Hectoliter per Minutes (hL/min) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per seconds?
Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the hectoliter per minutes to cubic centimeter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both hectoliter per minutes and cubic centimeter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1666.666667 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.