Volumetric flow rate.
Hectoliter per Minutes to Cubic inches per Millisecond Converter — hL/min to in3/ms
Convert Hectoliter per Minutes (hL/min) to Cubic inch per Millisecond (in3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 hectoliter per minutes = 0.1017062402 cubic inch per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Hectoliter per Minutes to Cubic inches per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.001666666667 / 0.016387064.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Hectoliter per Minutes to Cubic inches per Millisecond
Hectoliter per Minutes and Cubic inch per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic inches per millisecond = hectoliter per minutes × 0.101706240158
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 hectoliter per minutes equals 0.00166666666667 base units, and 1 cubic inch per millisecond equals 0.016387064 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct hectoliter per minutes-to-cubic inch per millisecond factor of 0.101706240158.
Simple example
1 hL/min × 0.1017062402 = 0.1017062402 in3/ms
1 hectoliter per minutes = 0.1017062402 cubic inches per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 hL/min × 0.1017062402 = 6.102374409 in3/ms
60 hectoliter per minutes = 6.102374409 cubic inches per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Hectoliter per Minutes (hL/min) | Cubic inch per Millisecond (in3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 hL/min | 0.010170624 in3/ms |
| 1 hL/min | 0.1017062402 in3/ms |
| 10 hL/min | 1.017062402 in3/ms |
| 60 hL/min | 6.102374409 in3/ms |
| 100 hL/min | 10.17062402 in3/ms |
| 1,000 hL/min | 101.7062402 in3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic inch per Millisecond to Hectoliter per Minutes
0.1017062402 in3/ms × 9.8322384 = 1 hL/min
0.1017062402 cubic inches per millisecond = 1 hectoliter per minutes.
hectoliter per minutes = cubic inches per millisecond × 9.8322384
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic inch per Millisecond to Hectoliter per Minutes.
Understanding the Hectoliter per Minutes (hL/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic inch per Millisecond (in3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic inches per millisecond are in 1 hectoliter per minutes?
1 hectoliter per minutes equals 0.1017062402 cubic inches per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert hectoliter per minutes to cubic inch per millisecond?
Multiply the hectoliter per minutes value by 0.1017062402. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic inch per millisecond back to hectoliter per minutes?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic inch per millisecond equals 9.8322384 hectoliter per minutes. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a hectoliter per minutes?
Hectoliter per Minutes (hL/min) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic inch per millisecond?
Cubic inch per Millisecond (in3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the hectoliter per minutes to cubic inch per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both hectoliter per minutes and cubic inch per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.1017062402 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.