Volumetric flow rate.
Hectoliter per Minutes to Cubic yards per Millisecond Converter — hL/min to yd3/ms
Convert Hectoliter per Minutes (hL/min) to Cubic yard per Millisecond (yd3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 hectoliter per minutes = 0.0000021799 cubic yard per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Hectoliter per Minutes to Cubic yards per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.001666666667 / 764.554858.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Hectoliter per Minutes to Cubic yards per Millisecond
Hectoliter per Minutes and Cubic yard per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic yards per millisecond = hectoliter per minutes × 0.00000217991769886
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 hectoliter per minutes equals 0.00166666666667 base units, and 1 cubic yard per millisecond equals 764.554857984 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct hectoliter per minutes-to-cubic yard per millisecond factor of 0.00000217991769886.
Simple example
1 hL/min × 0.000002179917699 = 0.0000021799 yd3/ms
1 hectoliter per minutes = 0.0000021799 cubic yards per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 hL/min × 0.000002179917699 = 0.0001307951 yd3/ms
60 hectoliter per minutes = 0.0001307951 cubic yards per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Hectoliter per Minutes (hL/min) | Cubic yard per Millisecond (yd3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 hL/min | 2.179918e-7 yd3/ms |
| 1 hL/min | 0.0000021799 yd3/ms |
| 10 hL/min | 0.0000217992 yd3/ms |
| 60 hL/min | 0.0001307951 yd3/ms |
| 100 hL/min | 0.0002179918 yd3/ms |
| 1,000 hL/min | 0.0021799177 yd3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic yard per Millisecond to Hectoliter per Minutes
0.0000021799 yd3/ms × 458732.9148 = 0.999991881 hL/min
0.0000021799 cubic yards per millisecond = 0.999991881 hectoliter per minutes.
hectoliter per minutes = cubic yards per millisecond × 458732.91479
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic yard per Millisecond to Hectoliter per Minutes.
Understanding the Hectoliter per Minutes (hL/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic yard per Millisecond (yd3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic yards per millisecond are in 1 hectoliter per minutes?
1 hectoliter per minutes equals 0.0000021799 cubic yards per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert hectoliter per minutes to cubic yard per millisecond?
Multiply the hectoliter per minutes value by 0.000002179917699. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic yard per millisecond back to hectoliter per minutes?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic yard per millisecond equals 458,732.9148 hectoliter per minutes. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a hectoliter per minutes?
Hectoliter per Minutes (hL/min) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic yard per millisecond?
Cubic yard per Millisecond (yd3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the hectoliter per minutes to cubic yard per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both hectoliter per minutes and cubic yard per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.000002179917699 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.