Volumetric flow rate.
Hectoliter per Seconds to Cubic feet per Millisecond Converter — hL/s to ft3/ms
Convert Hectoliter per Seconds (hL/s) to Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 hectoliter per seconds = 0.0035314667 cubic foot per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Hectoliter per Seconds to Cubic feet per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.1 / 28.31684659.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Hectoliter per Seconds to Cubic feet per Millisecond
Hectoliter per Seconds and Cubic foot per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic feet per millisecond = hectoliter per seconds × 0.00353146667215
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 hectoliter per seconds equals 0.1 base units, and 1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 28.316846592 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct hectoliter per seconds-to-cubic foot per millisecond factor of 0.00353146667215.
Simple example
1 hL/s × 0.003531466672 = 0.0035314667 ft3/ms
1 hectoliter per seconds = 0.0035314667 cubic feet per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 hL/s × 0.003531466672 = 0.2118880003 ft3/ms
60 hectoliter per seconds = 0.2118880003 cubic feet per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Hectoliter per Seconds (hL/s) | Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 hL/s | 0.0003531467 ft3/ms |
| 1 hL/s | 0.0035314667 ft3/ms |
| 10 hL/s | 0.0353146667 ft3/ms |
| 60 hL/s | 0.2118880003 ft3/ms |
| 100 hL/s | 0.3531466672 ft3/ms |
| 1,000 hL/s | 3.531466672 ft3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic foot per Millisecond to Hectoliter per Seconds
0.0035314667 ft3/ms × 283.1684659 = 1.000000008 hL/s
0.0035314667 cubic feet per millisecond = 1.000000008 hectoliter per seconds.
hectoliter per seconds = cubic feet per millisecond × 283.16846592
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic foot per Millisecond to Hectoliter per Seconds.
Understanding the Hectoliter per Seconds (hL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic feet per millisecond are in 1 hectoliter per seconds?
1 hectoliter per seconds equals 0.0035314667 cubic feet per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert hectoliter per seconds to cubic foot per millisecond?
Multiply the hectoliter per seconds value by 0.003531466672. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic foot per millisecond back to hectoliter per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 283.1684659 hectoliter per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a hectoliter per seconds?
Hectoliter per Seconds (hL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic foot per millisecond?
Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the hectoliter per seconds to cubic foot per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both hectoliter per seconds and cubic foot per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.003531466672 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.