Volumetric flow rate.
Hectoliter per Seconds to Cubic yards per Millisecond Converter — hL/s to yd3/ms
Convert Hectoliter per Seconds (hL/s) to Cubic yard per Millisecond (yd3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 hectoliter per seconds = 0.0001307951 cubic yard per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Hectoliter per Seconds to Cubic yards per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.1 / 764.554858.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Hectoliter per Seconds to Cubic yards per Millisecond
Hectoliter per Seconds and Cubic yard per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic yards per millisecond = hectoliter per seconds × 0.000130795061931
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 hectoliter per seconds equals 0.1 base units, and 1 cubic yard per millisecond equals 764.554857984 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct hectoliter per seconds-to-cubic yard per millisecond factor of 0.000130795061931.
Simple example
1 hL/s × 0.0001307950619 = 0.0001307951 yd3/ms
1 hectoliter per seconds = 0.0001307951 cubic yards per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 hL/s × 0.0001307950619 = 0.0078477037 yd3/ms
60 hectoliter per seconds = 0.0078477037 cubic yards per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Hectoliter per Seconds (hL/s) | Cubic yard per Millisecond (yd3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 hL/s | 0.0000130795 yd3/ms |
| 1 hL/s | 0.0001307951 yd3/ms |
| 10 hL/s | 0.0013079506 yd3/ms |
| 60 hL/s | 0.0078477037 yd3/ms |
| 100 hL/s | 0.0130795062 yd3/ms |
| 1,000 hL/s | 0.1307950619 yd3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic yard per Millisecond to Hectoliter per Seconds
0.0001307951 yd3/ms × 7645.54858 = 1.000000291 hL/s
0.0001307951 cubic yards per millisecond = 1.000000291 hectoliter per seconds.
hectoliter per seconds = cubic yards per millisecond × 7645.54857984
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic yard per Millisecond to Hectoliter per Seconds.
Understanding the Hectoliter per Seconds (hL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic yard per Millisecond (yd3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic yards per millisecond are in 1 hectoliter per seconds?
1 hectoliter per seconds equals 0.0001307951 cubic yards per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert hectoliter per seconds to cubic yard per millisecond?
Multiply the hectoliter per seconds value by 0.0001307950619. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic yard per millisecond back to hectoliter per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic yard per millisecond equals 7,645.54858 hectoliter per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a hectoliter per seconds?
Hectoliter per Seconds (hL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic yard per millisecond?
Cubic yard per Millisecond (yd3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the hectoliter per seconds to cubic yard per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both hectoliter per seconds and cubic yard per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.0001307950619 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.