Hectoliter per Seconds to Quart per Minutes Converter — hL/s to qt/min

Convert Hectoliter per Seconds (hL/s) to Quart per Minutes (qt/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 hectoliter per seconds = 6,340.129257 quart per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.

Hectoliter per Seconds to Quart per Minutes converter

Converter

Flow Rate Converter

Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.

Result 1 hectoliter per seconds = 6,340.129257 quart per minutes
Advertisement Converter ad slot

Reserved below the result so the calculator remains usable.

From definition

Volumetric flow rate.

To definition

Volumetric flow rate.

Formula

Result = input x 0.1 / 1.57725491e-5.

Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.

Advertisement Ad slot: content top (728x90)

Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.

About Converting Hectoliter per Seconds to Quart per Minutes

Hectoliter per Seconds and Quart per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.

Formula

quart per minutes = hectoliter per seconds × 6340.1292566

This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 hectoliter per seconds equals 0.1 base units, and 1 quart per minutes equals 0.0000157725491 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct hectoliter per seconds-to-quart per minutes factor of 6340.1292566.

Simple example

1 hL/s × 6340.129257 = 6,340.129257 qt/min

1 hectoliter per seconds = 6,340.129257 quart per minutes.

Real-world example

60 hL/s × 6340.129257 = 380,407.7554 qt/min

60 hectoliter per seconds = 380,407.7554 quart per minutes.

Conversion table

Hectoliter per Seconds (hL/s)Quart per Minutes (qt/min)
0.1 hL/s634.0129257 qt/min
1 hL/s6,340.129257 qt/min
10 hL/s63,401.29257 qt/min
60 hL/s380,407.7554 qt/min
100 hL/s634,012.9257 qt/min
1,000 hL/s6,340,129.257 qt/min

Reverse conversion: Quart per Minutes to Hectoliter per Seconds

1 qt/min × 0.000157725491 = 0.0001577255 hL/s

1 quart per minutes = 0.0001577255 hectoliter per seconds.

hectoliter per seconds = quart per minutes × 0.000157725491

For a page dedicated to this direction, see Quart per Minutes to Hectoliter per Seconds.

Understanding the Hectoliter per Seconds (hL/s)

Volumetric flow rate.

Understanding the Quart per Minutes (qt/min)

Volumetric flow rate.

Advertisement Ad slot: content middle (728x90)

Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.

Frequently asked questions

How many quart per minutes are in 1 hectoliter per seconds?

1 hectoliter per seconds equals 6,340.129257 quart per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.

How do I convert hectoliter per seconds to quart per minutes?

Multiply the hectoliter per seconds value by 6340.129257. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.

How do I convert quart per minutes back to hectoliter per seconds?

Use the reverse factor: 1 quart per minutes equals 0.0001577255 hectoliter per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.

What is a hectoliter per seconds?

Hectoliter per Seconds (hL/s) is a unit of flow rate.

What is a quart per minutes?

Quart per Minutes (qt/min) is a unit of flow rate.

Is the hectoliter per seconds to quart per minutes conversion exact?

Yes. Both hectoliter per seconds and quart per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 6340.129257 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.

What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?

Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.