Volumetric flow rate.
Hectoliter per Weeks to Milliliters per Millisecond Converter — hL/wk to mL/ms
Convert Hectoliter per Weeks (hL/wk) to Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 hectoliter per weeks = 0.0001653439 milliliter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Hectoliter per Weeks to Milliliters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-7 / 0.001.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Hectoliter per Weeks to Milliliters per Millisecond
Hectoliter per Weeks and Milliliter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
milliliters per millisecond = hectoliter per weeks × 0.000165343915344
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 hectoliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-7 base units, and 1 milliliter per millisecond equals 0.001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct hectoliter per weeks-to-milliliter per millisecond factor of 0.000165343915344.
Simple example
1 hL/wk × 0.0001653439153 = 0.0001653439 mL/ms
1 hectoliter per weeks = 0.0001653439 milliliters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 hL/wk × 0.0001653439153 = 0.0099206349 mL/ms
60 hectoliter per weeks = 0.0099206349 milliliters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Hectoliter per Weeks (hL/wk) | Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 hL/wk | 0.0000165344 mL/ms |
| 1 hL/wk | 0.0001653439 mL/ms |
| 10 hL/wk | 0.0016534392 mL/ms |
| 60 hL/wk | 0.0099206349 mL/ms |
| 100 hL/wk | 0.0165343915 mL/ms |
| 1,000 hL/wk | 0.1653439153 mL/ms |
Reverse conversion: Milliliter per Millisecond to Hectoliter per Weeks
0.0001653439 mL/ms × 6048 = 0.9999999072 hL/wk
0.0001653439 milliliters per millisecond = 0.9999999072 hectoliter per weeks.
hectoliter per weeks = milliliters per millisecond × 6048
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Milliliter per Millisecond to Hectoliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Hectoliter per Weeks (hL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many milliliters per millisecond are in 1 hectoliter per weeks?
1 hectoliter per weeks equals 0.0001653439 milliliters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert hectoliter per weeks to milliliter per millisecond?
Multiply the hectoliter per weeks value by 0.0001653439153. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert milliliter per millisecond back to hectoliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 milliliter per millisecond equals 6,048 hectoliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a hectoliter per weeks?
Hectoliter per Weeks (hL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a milliliter per millisecond?
Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the hectoliter per weeks to milliliter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both hectoliter per weeks and milliliter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.0001653439153 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.