Volumetric flow rate.
Hectoliter per Weeks to Imperial quart per Minutes Converter — hL/wk to imp qt/min
Convert Hectoliter per Weeks (hL/wk) to Imperial quart per Minutes (imp qt/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 hectoliter per weeks = 0.0087289384 imperial quart per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Hectoliter per Weeks to Imperial quart per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-7 / 1.89420417e-5.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Hectoliter per Weeks to Imperial quart per Minutes
Hectoliter per Weeks and Imperial quart per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quart per minutes = hectoliter per weeks × 0.00872893842457
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 hectoliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-7 base units, and 1 imperial quart per minutes equals 0.0000189420416667 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct hectoliter per weeks-to-imperial quart per minutes factor of 0.00872893842457.
Simple example
1 hL/wk × 0.008728938425 = 0.0087289384 imp qt/min
1 hectoliter per weeks = 0.0087289384 imperial quart per minutes.
Real-world example
60 hL/wk × 0.008728938425 = 0.5237363055 imp qt/min
60 hectoliter per weeks = 0.5237363055 imperial quart per minutes.
Conversion table
| Hectoliter per Weeks (hL/wk) | Imperial quart per Minutes (imp qt/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 hL/wk | 0.0008728938 imp qt/min |
| 1 hL/wk | 0.0087289384 imp qt/min |
| 10 hL/wk | 0.0872893843 imp qt/min |
| 60 hL/wk | 0.5237363055 imp qt/min |
| 100 hL/wk | 0.8728938425 imp qt/min |
| 1,000 hL/wk | 8.728938425 imp qt/min |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Minutes to Hectoliter per Weeks
0.0087289384 imp qt/min × 114.561468 = 0.9999999972 hL/wk
0.0087289384 imperial quart per minutes = 0.9999999972 hectoliter per weeks.
hectoliter per weeks = imperial quart per minutes × 114.561468
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Minutes to Hectoliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Hectoliter per Weeks (hL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Minutes (imp qt/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quart per minutes are in 1 hectoliter per weeks?
1 hectoliter per weeks equals 0.0087289384 imperial quart per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert hectoliter per weeks to imperial quart per minutes?
Multiply the hectoliter per weeks value by 0.008728938425. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per minutes back to hectoliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per minutes equals 114.561468 hectoliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a hectoliter per weeks?
Hectoliter per Weeks (hL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per minutes?
Imperial quart per Minutes (imp qt/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the hectoliter per weeks to imperial quart per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both hectoliter per weeks and imperial quart per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.008728938425 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.