Volumetric flow rate.
Hectoliter per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Seconds Converter — hL/wk to metric tsp/s
Convert Hectoliter per Weeks (hL/wk) to Metric teaspoon per Seconds (metric tsp/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 hectoliter per weeks = 0.0330687831 metric teaspoon per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Hectoliter per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-7 / 5e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Hectoliter per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Seconds
Hectoliter per Weeks and Metric teaspoon per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
metric teaspoon per seconds = hectoliter per weeks × 0.0330687830688
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 hectoliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-7 base units, and 1 metric teaspoon per seconds equals 0.000005 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct hectoliter per weeks-to-metric teaspoon per seconds factor of 0.0330687830688.
Simple example
1 hL/wk × 0.03306878307 = 0.0330687831 metric tsp/s
1 hectoliter per weeks = 0.0330687831 metric teaspoon per seconds.
Real-world example
60 hL/wk × 0.03306878307 = 1.984126984 metric tsp/s
60 hectoliter per weeks = 1.984126984 metric teaspoon per seconds.
Conversion table
| Hectoliter per Weeks (hL/wk) | Metric teaspoon per Seconds (metric tsp/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 hL/wk | 0.0033068783 metric tsp/s |
| 1 hL/wk | 0.0330687831 metric tsp/s |
| 10 hL/wk | 0.3306878307 metric tsp/s |
| 60 hL/wk | 1.984126984 metric tsp/s |
| 100 hL/wk | 3.306878307 metric tsp/s |
| 1,000 hL/wk | 33.06878307 metric tsp/s |
Reverse conversion: Metric teaspoon per Seconds to Hectoliter per Weeks
0.0330687831 metric tsp/s × 30.24 = 1.000000001 hL/wk
0.0330687831 metric teaspoon per seconds = 1.000000001 hectoliter per weeks.
hectoliter per weeks = metric teaspoon per seconds × 30.24
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Metric teaspoon per Seconds to Hectoliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Hectoliter per Weeks (hL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Metric teaspoon per Seconds (metric tsp/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many metric teaspoon per seconds are in 1 hectoliter per weeks?
1 hectoliter per weeks equals 0.0330687831 metric teaspoon per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert hectoliter per weeks to metric teaspoon per seconds?
Multiply the hectoliter per weeks value by 0.03306878307. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert metric teaspoon per seconds back to hectoliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 metric teaspoon per seconds equals 30.24 hectoliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a hectoliter per weeks?
Hectoliter per Weeks (hL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a metric teaspoon per seconds?
Metric teaspoon per Seconds (metric tsp/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the hectoliter per weeks to metric teaspoon per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both hectoliter per weeks and metric teaspoon per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.03306878307 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.