Volumetric flow rate.
Kiloliter per Decades to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds Converter — kL/decade to cm3/s
Convert Kiloliter per Decades (kL/decade) to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 kiloliter per decades = 0.0031688739 cubic centimeter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Kiloliter per Decades to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 3.16887385e-9 / 1e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Kiloliter per Decades to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds
Kiloliter per Decades and Cubic Centimeter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeter per seconds = kiloliter per decades × 0.00316887385068
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 kiloliter per decades equals 3.168874e-9 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per seconds equals 0.000001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct kiloliter per decades-to-cubic centimeter per seconds factor of 0.00316887385068.
Simple example
1 kL/decade × 0.003168873851 = 0.0031688739 cm3/s
1 kiloliter per decades = 0.0031688739 cubic centimeter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 kL/decade × 0.003168873851 = 0.190132431 cm3/s
60 kiloliter per decades = 0.190132431 cubic centimeter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Kiloliter per Decades (kL/decade) | Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 kL/decade | 0.0003168874 cm3/s |
| 1 kL/decade | 0.0031688739 cm3/s |
| 10 kL/decade | 0.0316887385 cm3/s |
| 60 kL/decade | 0.190132431 cm3/s |
| 100 kL/decade | 0.3168873851 cm3/s |
| 1,000 kL/decade | 3.168873851 cm3/s |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Kiloliter per Decades
0.0031688739 cm3/s × 315.56952 = 1.000000016 kL/decade
0.0031688739 cubic centimeter per seconds = 1.000000016 kiloliter per decades.
kiloliter per decades = cubic centimeter per seconds × 315.56952
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Kiloliter per Decades.
Understanding the Kiloliter per Decades (kL/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeter per seconds are in 1 kiloliter per decades?
1 kiloliter per decades equals 0.0031688739 cubic centimeter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert kiloliter per decades to cubic centimeter per seconds?
Multiply the kiloliter per decades value by 0.003168873851. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per seconds back to kiloliter per decades?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per seconds equals 315.56952 kiloliter per decades. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a kiloliter per decades?
Kiloliter per Decades (kL/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per seconds?
Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the kiloliter per decades to cubic centimeter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both kiloliter per decades and cubic centimeter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.003168873851 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.