Volumetric flow rate.
Kiloliters per Fortnight to Centiliters per Millisecond Converter — kL/fn to cL/ms
Convert Kiloliter per Fortnight (kL/fn) to Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 kiloliter per fortnight = 0.000082672 centiliter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Kiloliters per Fortnight to Centiliters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.26719577e-7 / 0.01.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Kiloliters per Fortnight to Centiliters per Millisecond
Kiloliter per Fortnight and Centiliter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
centiliters per millisecond = kiloliters per fortnight × 0.000082671957672
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 kiloliter per fortnight equals 8.267196e-7 base units, and 1 centiliter per millisecond equals 0.01 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct kiloliter per fortnight-to-centiliter per millisecond factor of 0.000082671957672.
Simple example
1 kL/fn × 0.00008267195767 = 0.000082672 cL/ms
1 kiloliter per fortnight = 0.000082672 centiliters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 kL/fn × 0.00008267195767 = 0.0049603175 cL/ms
60 kiloliters per fortnight = 0.0049603175 centiliters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Kiloliter per Fortnight (kL/fn) | Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 kL/fn | 0.0000082672 cL/ms |
| 1 kL/fn | 0.000082672 cL/ms |
| 10 kL/fn | 0.0008267196 cL/ms |
| 60 kL/fn | 0.0049603175 cL/ms |
| 100 kL/fn | 0.0082671958 cL/ms |
| 1,000 kL/fn | 0.0826719577 cL/ms |
Reverse conversion: Centiliter per Millisecond to Kiloliter per Fortnight
0.000082672 cL/ms × 12096 = 1.000000512 kL/fn
0.000082672 centiliters per millisecond = 1.000000512 kiloliters per fortnight.
kiloliters per fortnight = centiliters per millisecond × 12096
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Centiliter per Millisecond to Kiloliter per Fortnight.
Understanding the Kiloliter per Fortnight (kL/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many centiliters per millisecond are in 1 kiloliter per fortnight?
1 kiloliter per fortnight equals 0.000082672 centiliters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert kiloliter per fortnight to centiliter per millisecond?
Multiply the kiloliter per fortnight value by 0.00008267195767. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert centiliter per millisecond back to kiloliter per fortnight?
Use the reverse factor: 1 centiliter per millisecond equals 12,096 kiloliters per fortnight. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a kiloliter per fortnight?
Kiloliter per Fortnight (kL/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a centiliter per millisecond?
Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the kiloliter per fortnight to centiliter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both kiloliter per fortnight and centiliter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00008267195767 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.