Volumetric flow rate.
Kiloliters per Fortnight to Hectoliters per Millisecond Converter — kL/fn to hL/ms
Convert Kiloliter per Fortnight (kL/fn) to Hectoliter per Millisecond (hL/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 kiloliter per fortnight = 8.267196e-9 hectoliter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Kiloliters per Fortnight to Hectoliters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.26719577e-7 / 100.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Kiloliters per Fortnight to Hectoliters per Millisecond
Kiloliter per Fortnight and Hectoliter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
hectoliters per millisecond = kiloliters per fortnight × 8.267196e-9
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 kiloliter per fortnight equals 8.267196e-7 base units, and 1 hectoliter per millisecond equals 100 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct kiloliter per fortnight-to-hectoliter per millisecond factor of 8.267196e-9.
Simple example
1 kL/fn × 8.267196e-9 = 8.267196e-9 hL/ms
1 kiloliter per fortnight = 8.267196e-9 hectoliters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 kL/fn × 8.267196e-9 = 4.960317e-7 hL/ms
60 kiloliters per fortnight = 4.960317e-7 hectoliters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Kiloliter per Fortnight (kL/fn) | Hectoliter per Millisecond (hL/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 kL/fn | 8.267196e-10 hL/ms |
| 1 kL/fn | 8.267196e-9 hL/ms |
| 10 kL/fn | 8.267196e-8 hL/ms |
| 60 kL/fn | 4.960317e-7 hL/ms |
| 100 kL/fn | 8.267196e-7 hL/ms |
| 1,000 kL/fn | 0.0000082672 hL/ms |
Reverse conversion: Hectoliter per Millisecond to Kiloliter per Fortnight
8.267196e-9 hL/ms × 120960000 = 1.000000028 kL/fn
8.267196e-9 hectoliters per millisecond = 1.000000028 kiloliters per fortnight.
kiloliters per fortnight = hectoliters per millisecond × 120960000
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Hectoliter per Millisecond to Kiloliter per Fortnight.
Understanding the Kiloliter per Fortnight (kL/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Hectoliter per Millisecond (hL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many hectoliters per millisecond are in 1 kiloliter per fortnight?
1 kiloliter per fortnight equals 8.267196e-9 hectoliters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert kiloliter per fortnight to hectoliter per millisecond?
Multiply the kiloliter per fortnight value by 8.267196e-9. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert hectoliter per millisecond back to kiloliter per fortnight?
Use the reverse factor: 1 hectoliter per millisecond equals 120,960,000 kiloliters per fortnight. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a kiloliter per fortnight?
Kiloliter per Fortnight (kL/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a hectoliter per millisecond?
Hectoliter per Millisecond (hL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the kiloliter per fortnight to hectoliter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both kiloliter per fortnight and hectoliter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 8.267196e-9 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.