Volumetric flow rate.
Kiloliter per Hours to Cubic Centimeters per Millisecond Converter — kL/h to cm3/ms
Convert Kiloliter per Hours (kL/h) to Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 kiloliter per hours = 0.2777777778 cubic centimeter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Kiloliter per Hours to Cubic Centimeters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.0002777777778 / 0.001.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Kiloliter per Hours to Cubic Centimeters per Millisecond
Kiloliter per Hours and Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeters per millisecond = kiloliter per hours × 0.277777777778
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 kiloliter per hours equals 0.000277777777778 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per millisecond equals 0.001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct kiloliter per hours-to-cubic centimeter per millisecond factor of 0.277777777778.
Simple example
1 kL/h × 0.2777777778 = 0.2777777778 cm3/ms
1 kiloliter per hours = 0.2777777778 cubic centimeters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 kL/h × 0.2777777778 = 16.66666667 cm3/ms
60 kiloliter per hours = 16.66666667 cubic centimeters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Kiloliter per Hours (kL/h) | Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 kL/h | 0.0277777778 cm3/ms |
| 1 kL/h | 0.2777777778 cm3/ms |
| 10 kL/h | 2.777777778 cm3/ms |
| 60 kL/h | 16.66666667 cm3/ms |
| 100 kL/h | 27.77777778 cm3/ms |
| 1,000 kL/h | 277.7777778 cm3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond to Kiloliter per Hours
0.2777777778 cm3/ms × 3.6 = 1 kL/h
0.2777777778 cubic centimeters per millisecond = 1 kiloliter per hours.
kiloliter per hours = cubic centimeters per millisecond × 3.6
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond to Kiloliter per Hours.
Understanding the Kiloliter per Hours (kL/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeters per millisecond are in 1 kiloliter per hours?
1 kiloliter per hours equals 0.2777777778 cubic centimeters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert kiloliter per hours to cubic centimeter per millisecond?
Multiply the kiloliter per hours value by 0.2777777778. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per millisecond back to kiloliter per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per millisecond equals 3.6 kiloliter per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a kiloliter per hours?
Kiloliter per Hours (kL/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per millisecond?
Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the kiloliter per hours to cubic centimeter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both kiloliter per hours and cubic centimeter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.2777777778 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.