Volumetric flow rate.
Kiloliter per Hours to Cubic Millimeters per Millisecond Converter — kL/h to mm3/ms
Convert Kiloliter per Hours (kL/h) to Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 kiloliter per hours = 277.7777778 cubic millimeter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Kiloliter per Hours to Cubic Millimeters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.0002777777778 / 1e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Kiloliter per Hours to Cubic Millimeters per Millisecond
Kiloliter per Hours and Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeters per millisecond = kiloliter per hours × 277.777777778
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 kiloliter per hours equals 0.000277777777778 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per millisecond equals 0.000001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct kiloliter per hours-to-cubic millimeter per millisecond factor of 277.777777778.
Simple example
1 kL/h × 277.7777778 = 277.7777778 mm3/ms
1 kiloliter per hours = 277.7777778 cubic millimeters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 kL/h × 277.7777778 = 16,666.66667 mm3/ms
60 kiloliter per hours = 16,666.66667 cubic millimeters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Kiloliter per Hours (kL/h) | Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 kL/h | 27.77777778 mm3/ms |
| 1 kL/h | 277.7777778 mm3/ms |
| 10 kL/h | 2,777.777778 mm3/ms |
| 60 kL/h | 16,666.66667 mm3/ms |
| 100 kL/h | 27,777.77778 mm3/ms |
| 1,000 kL/h | 277,777.7778 mm3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond to Kiloliter per Hours
277.7777778 mm3/ms × 0.0036 = 1 kL/h
277.7777778 cubic millimeters per millisecond = 1 kiloliter per hours.
kiloliter per hours = cubic millimeters per millisecond × 0.0036
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond to Kiloliter per Hours.
Understanding the Kiloliter per Hours (kL/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeters per millisecond are in 1 kiloliter per hours?
1 kiloliter per hours equals 277.7777778 cubic millimeters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert kiloliter per hours to cubic millimeter per millisecond?
Multiply the kiloliter per hours value by 277.7777778. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per millisecond back to kiloliter per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per millisecond equals 0.0036 kiloliter per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a kiloliter per hours?
Kiloliter per Hours (kL/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per millisecond?
Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the kiloliter per hours to cubic millimeter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both kiloliter per hours and cubic millimeter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 277.7777778 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.