Volumetric flow rate.
Kiloliter per Minutes to Bushels per Millisecond Converter — kL/min to bu/ms
Convert Kiloliter per Minutes (kL/min) to Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 kiloliter per minutes = 0.0004729599 bushel per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Kiloliter per Minutes to Bushels per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.01666666667 / 35.23907017.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Kiloliter per Minutes to Bushels per Millisecond
Kiloliter per Minutes and Bushel per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
bushels per millisecond = kiloliter per minutes × 0.00047295988764
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 kiloliter per minutes equals 0.0166666666667 base units, and 1 bushel per millisecond equals 35.2390701669 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct kiloliter per minutes-to-bushel per millisecond factor of 0.00047295988764.
Simple example
1 kL/min × 0.0004729598876 = 0.0004729599 bu/ms
1 kiloliter per minutes = 0.0004729599 bushels per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 kL/min × 0.0004729598876 = 0.0283775933 bu/ms
60 kiloliter per minutes = 0.0283775933 bushels per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Kiloliter per Minutes (kL/min) | Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 kL/min | 0.000047296 bu/ms |
| 1 kL/min | 0.0004729599 bu/ms |
| 10 kL/min | 0.0047295989 bu/ms |
| 60 kL/min | 0.0283775933 bu/ms |
| 100 kL/min | 0.0472959888 bu/ms |
| 1,000 kL/min | 0.4729598876 bu/ms |
Reverse conversion: Bushel per Millisecond to Kiloliter per Minutes
0.0004729599 bu/ms × 2114.34421 = 1.000000026 kL/min
0.0004729599 bushels per millisecond = 1.000000026 kiloliter per minutes.
kiloliter per minutes = bushels per millisecond × 2114.34421001
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Bushel per Millisecond to Kiloliter per Minutes.
Understanding the Kiloliter per Minutes (kL/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many bushels per millisecond are in 1 kiloliter per minutes?
1 kiloliter per minutes equals 0.0004729599 bushels per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert kiloliter per minutes to bushel per millisecond?
Multiply the kiloliter per minutes value by 0.0004729598876. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert bushel per millisecond back to kiloliter per minutes?
Use the reverse factor: 1 bushel per millisecond equals 2,114.34421 kiloliter per minutes. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a kiloliter per minutes?
Kiloliter per Minutes (kL/min) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a bushel per millisecond?
Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the kiloliter per minutes to bushel per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both kiloliter per minutes and bushel per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.0004729598876 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.