Volumetric flow rate.
Kiloliter per Seconds to Cubic Millimeter per Years Converter — kL/s to mm3/yr
Convert Kiloliter per Seconds (kL/s) to Cubic Millimeter per Years (mm3/yr) using the exact conversion factor (1 kiloliter per seconds = 3.155695e+16 cubic millimeter per years). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Kiloliter per Seconds to Cubic Millimeter per Years converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1 / 3.16887385e-17.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Kiloliter per Seconds to Cubic Millimeter per Years
Kiloliter per Seconds and Cubic Millimeter per Years both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeter per years = kiloliter per seconds × 3.155695e+16
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 kiloliter per seconds equals 1 base unit, and 1 cubic millimeter per years equals 3.168874e-17 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct kiloliter per seconds-to-cubic millimeter per years factor of 3.155695e+16.
Simple example
1 kL/s × 3.155695e+16 = 3.155695e+16 mm3/yr
1 kiloliter per seconds = 3.155695e+16 cubic millimeter per years.
Real-world example
60 kL/s × 3.155695e+16 = 1.893417e+18 mm3/yr
60 kiloliter per seconds = 1.893417e+18 cubic millimeter per years.
Conversion table
| Kiloliter per Seconds (kL/s) | Cubic Millimeter per Years (mm3/yr) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 kL/s | 3.155695e+15 mm3/yr |
| 1 kL/s | 3.155695e+16 mm3/yr |
| 10 kL/s | 3.155695e+17 mm3/yr |
| 60 kL/s | 1.893417e+18 mm3/yr |
| 100 kL/s | 3.155695e+18 mm3/yr |
| 1,000 kL/s | 3.155695e+19 mm3/yr |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Years to Kiloliter per Seconds
3.155695e+16 mm3/yr × 3.168874e-17 = 0.9999999366 kL/s
3.155695e+16 cubic millimeter per years = 0.9999999366 kiloliter per seconds.
kiloliter per seconds = cubic millimeter per years × 3.168874e-17
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Years to Kiloliter per Seconds.
Understanding the Kiloliter per Seconds (kL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Years (mm3/yr)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeter per years are in 1 kiloliter per seconds?
1 kiloliter per seconds equals 3.155695e+16 cubic millimeter per years, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert kiloliter per seconds to cubic millimeter per years?
Multiply the kiloliter per seconds value by 3.155695e+16. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per years back to kiloliter per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per years equals 3.168874e-17 kiloliter per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a kiloliter per seconds?
Kiloliter per Seconds (kL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per years?
Cubic Millimeter per Years (mm3/yr) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the kiloliter per seconds to cubic millimeter per years conversion exact?
Yes. Both kiloliter per seconds and cubic millimeter per years are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 3.155695e+16 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.