Volumetric flow rate.
Kiloliter per Weeks to Cubic Centimeters per Fortnight Converter — kL/wk to cm3/fn
Convert Kiloliter per Weeks (kL/wk) to Cubic Centimeter per Fortnight (cm3/fn) using the exact conversion factor (1 kiloliter per weeks = 2,000,000 cubic centimeter per fortnight). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Kiloliter per Weeks to Cubic Centimeters per Fortnight converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-6 / 8.26719577e-13.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Kiloliter per Weeks to Cubic Centimeters per Fortnight
Kiloliter per Weeks and Cubic Centimeter per Fortnight both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeters per fortnight = kiloliter per weeks × 2000000
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 kiloliter per weeks equals 0.00000165343915344 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per fortnight equals 8.267196e-13 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct kiloliter per weeks-to-cubic centimeter per fortnight factor of 2000000.
Simple example
1 kL/wk × 2000000 = 2,000,000 cm3/fn
1 kiloliter per weeks = 2,000,000 cubic centimeters per fortnight.
Real-world example
60 kL/wk × 2000000 = 120,000,000 cm3/fn
60 kiloliter per weeks = 120,000,000 cubic centimeters per fortnight.
Conversion table
| Kiloliter per Weeks (kL/wk) | Cubic Centimeter per Fortnight (cm3/fn) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 kL/wk | 200,000 cm3/fn |
| 1 kL/wk | 2,000,000 cm3/fn |
| 10 kL/wk | 20,000,000 cm3/fn |
| 60 kL/wk | 120,000,000 cm3/fn |
| 100 kL/wk | 200,000,000 cm3/fn |
| 1,000 kL/wk | 2,000,000,000 cm3/fn |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Fortnight to Kiloliter per Weeks
1 cm3/fn × 5e-7 = 5e-7 kL/wk
1 cubic centimeter per fortnight = 5e-7 kiloliter per weeks.
kiloliter per weeks = cubic centimeters per fortnight × 5e-7
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Fortnight to Kiloliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Kiloliter per Weeks (kL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Fortnight (cm3/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeters per fortnight are in 1 kiloliter per weeks?
1 kiloliter per weeks equals 2,000,000 cubic centimeters per fortnight, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert kiloliter per weeks to cubic centimeter per fortnight?
Multiply the kiloliter per weeks value by 2000000. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per fortnight back to kiloliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per fortnight equals 5e-7 kiloliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a kiloliter per weeks?
Kiloliter per Weeks (kL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per fortnight?
Cubic Centimeter per Fortnight (cm3/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the kiloliter per weeks to cubic centimeter per fortnight conversion exact?
Yes. Both kiloliter per weeks and cubic centimeter per fortnight are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 2000000 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.