Volumetric flow rate.
Kiloliter per Weeks to Cubic Centimeters per Millisecond Converter — kL/wk to cm3/ms
Convert Kiloliter per Weeks (kL/wk) to Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 kiloliter per weeks = 0.0016534392 cubic centimeter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Kiloliter per Weeks to Cubic Centimeters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-6 / 0.001.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Kiloliter per Weeks to Cubic Centimeters per Millisecond
Kiloliter per Weeks and Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeters per millisecond = kiloliter per weeks × 0.00165343915344
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 kiloliter per weeks equals 0.00000165343915344 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per millisecond equals 0.001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct kiloliter per weeks-to-cubic centimeter per millisecond factor of 0.00165343915344.
Simple example
1 kL/wk × 0.001653439153 = 0.0016534392 cm3/ms
1 kiloliter per weeks = 0.0016534392 cubic centimeters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 kL/wk × 0.001653439153 = 0.0992063492 cm3/ms
60 kiloliter per weeks = 0.0992063492 cubic centimeters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Kiloliter per Weeks (kL/wk) | Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 kL/wk | 0.0001653439 cm3/ms |
| 1 kL/wk | 0.0016534392 cm3/ms |
| 10 kL/wk | 0.0165343915 cm3/ms |
| 60 kL/wk | 0.0992063492 cm3/ms |
| 100 kL/wk | 0.1653439153 cm3/ms |
| 1,000 kL/wk | 1.653439153 cm3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond to Kiloliter per Weeks
0.0016534392 cm3/ms × 604.8 = 1.000000028 kL/wk
0.0016534392 cubic centimeters per millisecond = 1.000000028 kiloliter per weeks.
kiloliter per weeks = cubic centimeters per millisecond × 604.8
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond to Kiloliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Kiloliter per Weeks (kL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeters per millisecond are in 1 kiloliter per weeks?
1 kiloliter per weeks equals 0.0016534392 cubic centimeters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert kiloliter per weeks to cubic centimeter per millisecond?
Multiply the kiloliter per weeks value by 0.001653439153. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per millisecond back to kiloliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per millisecond equals 604.8 kiloliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a kiloliter per weeks?
Kiloliter per Weeks (kL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per millisecond?
Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the kiloliter per weeks to cubic centimeter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both kiloliter per weeks and cubic centimeter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.001653439153 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.