Volumetric flow rate.
Kiloliter per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Minutes Converter — kL/wk to cm3/min
Convert Kiloliter per Weeks (kL/wk) to Cubic Centimeter per Minutes (cm3/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 kiloliter per weeks = 99.20634921 cubic centimeter per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Kiloliter per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-6 / 1.66666667e-8.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Kiloliter per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Minutes
Kiloliter per Weeks and Cubic Centimeter per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeter per minutes = kiloliter per weeks × 99.2063492063
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 kiloliter per weeks equals 0.00000165343915344 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per minutes equals 1.666667e-8 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct kiloliter per weeks-to-cubic centimeter per minutes factor of 99.2063492063.
Simple example
1 kL/wk × 99.20634921 = 99.20634921 cm3/min
1 kiloliter per weeks = 99.20634921 cubic centimeter per minutes.
Real-world example
60 kL/wk × 99.20634921 = 5,952.380952 cm3/min
60 kiloliter per weeks = 5,952.380952 cubic centimeter per minutes.
Conversion table
| Kiloliter per Weeks (kL/wk) | Cubic Centimeter per Minutes (cm3/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 kL/wk | 9.920634921 cm3/min |
| 1 kL/wk | 99.20634921 cm3/min |
| 10 kL/wk | 992.0634921 cm3/min |
| 60 kL/wk | 5,952.380952 cm3/min |
| 100 kL/wk | 9,920.634921 cm3/min |
| 1,000 kL/wk | 99,206.34921 cm3/min |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Minutes to Kiloliter per Weeks
99.20634921 cm3/min × 0.01008 = 1 kL/wk
99.20634921 cubic centimeter per minutes = 1 kiloliter per weeks.
kiloliter per weeks = cubic centimeter per minutes × 0.01008
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Minutes to Kiloliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Kiloliter per Weeks (kL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Minutes (cm3/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeter per minutes are in 1 kiloliter per weeks?
1 kiloliter per weeks equals 99.20634921 cubic centimeter per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert kiloliter per weeks to cubic centimeter per minutes?
Multiply the kiloliter per weeks value by 99.20634921. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per minutes back to kiloliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per minutes equals 0.01008 kiloliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a kiloliter per weeks?
Kiloliter per Weeks (kL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per minutes?
Cubic Centimeter per Minutes (cm3/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the kiloliter per weeks to cubic centimeter per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both kiloliter per weeks and cubic centimeter per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 99.20634921 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.