Volumetric flow rate.
Kiloliter per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds Converter — kL/wk to cm3/s
Convert Kiloliter per Weeks (kL/wk) to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 kiloliter per weeks = 1.653439153 cubic centimeter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Kiloliter per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-6 / 1e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Kiloliter per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds
Kiloliter per Weeks and Cubic Centimeter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeter per seconds = kiloliter per weeks × 1.65343915344
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 kiloliter per weeks equals 0.00000165343915344 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per seconds equals 0.000001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct kiloliter per weeks-to-cubic centimeter per seconds factor of 1.65343915344.
Simple example
1 kL/wk × 1.653439153 = 1.653439153 cm3/s
1 kiloliter per weeks = 1.653439153 cubic centimeter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 kL/wk × 1.653439153 = 99.20634921 cm3/s
60 kiloliter per weeks = 99.20634921 cubic centimeter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Kiloliter per Weeks (kL/wk) | Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 kL/wk | 0.1653439153 cm3/s |
| 1 kL/wk | 1.653439153 cm3/s |
| 10 kL/wk | 16.53439153 cm3/s |
| 60 kL/wk | 99.20634921 cm3/s |
| 100 kL/wk | 165.3439153 cm3/s |
| 1,000 kL/wk | 1,653.439153 cm3/s |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Kiloliter per Weeks
1.653439153 cm3/s × 0.6048 = 0.9999999997 kL/wk
1.653439153 cubic centimeter per seconds = 0.9999999997 kiloliter per weeks.
kiloliter per weeks = cubic centimeter per seconds × 0.6048
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Kiloliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Kiloliter per Weeks (kL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeter per seconds are in 1 kiloliter per weeks?
1 kiloliter per weeks equals 1.653439153 cubic centimeter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert kiloliter per weeks to cubic centimeter per seconds?
Multiply the kiloliter per weeks value by 1.653439153. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per seconds back to kiloliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per seconds equals 0.6048 kiloliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a kiloliter per weeks?
Kiloliter per Weeks (kL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per seconds?
Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the kiloliter per weeks to cubic centimeter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both kiloliter per weeks and cubic centimeter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1.653439153 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.