Volumetric flow rate.
Kiloliter per Weeks to Fluid ounces per Millisecond Converter — kL/wk to fl oz/ms
Convert Kiloliter per Weeks (kL/wk) to Fluid ounce per Millisecond (fl oz/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 kiloliter per weeks = 0.0000559094 fluid ounce per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Kiloliter per Weeks to Fluid ounces per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-6 / 0.02957352956.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Kiloliter per Weeks to Fluid ounces per Millisecond
Kiloliter per Weeks and Fluid ounce per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
fluid ounces per millisecond = kiloliter per weeks × 0.0000559094290705
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 kiloliter per weeks equals 0.00000165343915344 base units, and 1 fluid ounce per millisecond equals 0.0295735295625 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct kiloliter per weeks-to-fluid ounce per millisecond factor of 0.0000559094290705.
Simple example
1 kL/wk × 0.00005590942907 = 0.0000559094 fl oz/ms
1 kiloliter per weeks = 0.0000559094 fluid ounces per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 kL/wk × 0.00005590942907 = 0.0033545657 fl oz/ms
60 kiloliter per weeks = 0.0033545657 fluid ounces per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Kiloliter per Weeks (kL/wk) | Fluid ounce per Millisecond (fl oz/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 kL/wk | 0.0000055909 fl oz/ms |
| 1 kL/wk | 0.0000559094 fl oz/ms |
| 10 kL/wk | 0.0005590943 fl oz/ms |
| 60 kL/wk | 0.0033545657 fl oz/ms |
| 100 kL/wk | 0.0055909429 fl oz/ms |
| 1,000 kL/wk | 0.0559094291 fl oz/ms |
Reverse conversion: Fluid ounce per Millisecond to Kiloliter per Weeks
0.0000559094 fl oz/ms × 17886.07068 = 0.99999948 kL/wk
0.0000559094 fluid ounces per millisecond = 0.99999948 kiloliter per weeks.
kiloliter per weeks = fluid ounces per millisecond × 17886.0706794
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Fluid ounce per Millisecond to Kiloliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Kiloliter per Weeks (kL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Fluid ounce per Millisecond (fl oz/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many fluid ounces per millisecond are in 1 kiloliter per weeks?
1 kiloliter per weeks equals 0.0000559094 fluid ounces per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert kiloliter per weeks to fluid ounce per millisecond?
Multiply the kiloliter per weeks value by 0.00005590942907. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert fluid ounce per millisecond back to kiloliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 fluid ounce per millisecond equals 17,886.07068 kiloliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a kiloliter per weeks?
Kiloliter per Weeks (kL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a fluid ounce per millisecond?
Fluid ounce per Millisecond (fl oz/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the kiloliter per weeks to fluid ounce per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both kiloliter per weeks and fluid ounce per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00005590942907 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.