Volumetric flow rate.
Liter per Decades to Cubic Centimeters per Millisecond Converter — L/decade to cm3/ms
Convert Liter per Decades (L/decade) to Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 liter per decades = 3.168874e-9 cubic centimeter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Liter per Decades to Cubic Centimeters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 3.16887385e-12 / 0.001.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Liter per Decades to Cubic Centimeters per Millisecond
Liter per Decades and Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeters per millisecond = liter per decades × 3.168874e-9
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 liter per decades equals 3.168874e-12 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per millisecond equals 0.001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct liter per decades-to-cubic centimeter per millisecond factor of 3.168874e-9.
Simple example
1 L/decade × 3.168874e-9 = 3.168874e-9 cm3/ms
1 liter per decades = 3.168874e-9 cubic centimeters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 L/decade × 3.168874e-9 = 1.901324e-7 cm3/ms
60 liter per decades = 1.901324e-7 cubic centimeters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Liter per Decades (L/decade) | Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 L/decade | 3.168874e-10 cm3/ms |
| 1 L/decade | 3.168874e-9 cm3/ms |
| 10 L/decade | 3.168874e-8 cm3/ms |
| 60 L/decade | 1.901324e-7 cm3/ms |
| 100 L/decade | 3.168874e-7 cm3/ms |
| 1,000 L/decade | 0.0000031689 cm3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond to Liter per Decades
3.168874e-9 cm3/ms × 315569520 = 1.000000047 L/decade
3.168874e-9 cubic centimeters per millisecond = 1.000000047 liter per decades.
liter per decades = cubic centimeters per millisecond × 315569520
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond to Liter per Decades.
Understanding the Liter per Decades (L/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeters per millisecond are in 1 liter per decades?
1 liter per decades equals 3.168874e-9 cubic centimeters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert liter per decades to cubic centimeter per millisecond?
Multiply the liter per decades value by 3.168874e-9. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per millisecond back to liter per decades?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per millisecond equals 315,569,520 liter per decades. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a liter per decades?
Liter per Decades (L/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per millisecond?
Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the liter per decades to cubic centimeter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both liter per decades and cubic centimeter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 3.168874e-9 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.