Volumetric flow rate.
Liter per Decades to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds Converter — L/decade to cm3/s
Convert Liter per Decades (L/decade) to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 liter per decades = 0.0000031689 cubic centimeter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Liter per Decades to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 3.16887385e-12 / 1e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Liter per Decades to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds
Liter per Decades and Cubic Centimeter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeter per seconds = liter per decades × 0.00000316887385068
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 liter per decades equals 3.168874e-12 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per seconds equals 0.000001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct liter per decades-to-cubic centimeter per seconds factor of 0.00000316887385068.
Simple example
1 L/decade × 0.000003168873851 = 0.0000031689 cm3/s
1 liter per decades = 0.0000031689 cubic centimeter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 L/decade × 0.000003168873851 = 0.0001901324 cm3/s
60 liter per decades = 0.0001901324 cubic centimeter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Liter per Decades (L/decade) | Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 L/decade | 3.168874e-7 cm3/s |
| 1 L/decade | 0.0000031689 cm3/s |
| 10 L/decade | 0.0000316887 cm3/s |
| 60 L/decade | 0.0001901324 cm3/s |
| 100 L/decade | 0.0003168874 cm3/s |
| 1,000 L/decade | 0.0031688739 cm3/s |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Liter per Decades
0.0000031689 cm3/s × 315569.52 = 1.000008252 L/decade
0.0000031689 cubic centimeter per seconds = 1.000008252 liter per decades.
liter per decades = cubic centimeter per seconds × 315569.52
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Liter per Decades.
Understanding the Liter per Decades (L/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeter per seconds are in 1 liter per decades?
1 liter per decades equals 0.0000031689 cubic centimeter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert liter per decades to cubic centimeter per seconds?
Multiply the liter per decades value by 0.000003168873851. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per seconds back to liter per decades?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per seconds equals 315,569.52 liter per decades. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a liter per decades?
Liter per Decades (L/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per seconds?
Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the liter per decades to cubic centimeter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both liter per decades and cubic centimeter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.000003168873851 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.