Volumetric flow rate.
Liter per Decades to Fluid ounces per Millisecond Converter — L/decade to fl oz/ms
Convert Liter per Decades (L/decade) to Fluid ounce per Millisecond (fl oz/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 liter per decades = 1.071524e-10 fluid ounce per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Liter per Decades to Fluid ounces per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 3.16887385e-12 / 0.02957352956.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Liter per Decades to Fluid ounces per Millisecond
Liter per Decades and Fluid ounce per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
fluid ounces per millisecond = liter per decades × 1.071524e-10
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 liter per decades equals 3.168874e-12 base units, and 1 fluid ounce per millisecond equals 0.0295735295625 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct liter per decades-to-fluid ounce per millisecond factor of 1.071524e-10.
Simple example
1 L/decade × 1.071524e-10 = 1.071524e-10 fl oz/ms
1 liter per decades = 1.071524e-10 fluid ounces per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 L/decade × 1.071524e-10 = 6.429142e-9 fl oz/ms
60 liter per decades = 6.429142e-9 fluid ounces per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Liter per Decades (L/decade) | Fluid ounce per Millisecond (fl oz/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 L/decade | 1.071524e-11 fl oz/ms |
| 1 L/decade | 1.071524e-10 fl oz/ms |
| 10 L/decade | 1.071524e-9 fl oz/ms |
| 60 L/decade | 6.429142e-9 fl oz/ms |
| 100 L/decade | 1.071524e-8 fl oz/ms |
| 1,000 L/decade | 1.071524e-7 fl oz/ms |
Reverse conversion: Fluid ounce per Millisecond to Liter per Decades
1.071524e-10 fl oz/ms × 9332504529 = 1.000000258 L/decade
1.071524e-10 fluid ounces per millisecond = 1.000000258 liter per decades.
liter per decades = fluid ounces per millisecond × 9332504528.74
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Fluid ounce per Millisecond to Liter per Decades.
Understanding the Liter per Decades (L/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Fluid ounce per Millisecond (fl oz/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many fluid ounces per millisecond are in 1 liter per decades?
1 liter per decades equals 1.071524e-10 fluid ounces per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert liter per decades to fluid ounce per millisecond?
Multiply the liter per decades value by 1.071524e-10. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert fluid ounce per millisecond back to liter per decades?
Use the reverse factor: 1 fluid ounce per millisecond equals 9,332,504,529 liter per decades. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a liter per decades?
Liter per Decades (L/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a fluid ounce per millisecond?
Fluid ounce per Millisecond (fl oz/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the liter per decades to fluid ounce per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both liter per decades and fluid ounce per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1.071524e-10 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.