Volumetric flow rate.
Liter per Hours to Cubic Centimeters per Millisecond Converter — L/h to cm3/ms
Convert Liter per Hours (L/h) to Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 liter per hours = 0.0002777778 cubic centimeter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Liter per Hours to Cubic Centimeters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 2.77777778e-7 / 0.001.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Liter per Hours to Cubic Centimeters per Millisecond
Liter per Hours and Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeters per millisecond = liter per hours × 0.000277777777778
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 liter per hours equals 2.777778e-7 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per millisecond equals 0.001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct liter per hours-to-cubic centimeter per millisecond factor of 0.000277777777778.
Simple example
1 L/h × 0.0002777777778 = 0.0002777778 cm3/ms
1 liter per hours = 0.0002777778 cubic centimeters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 L/h × 0.0002777777778 = 0.0166666667 cm3/ms
60 liter per hours = 0.0166666667 cubic centimeters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Liter per Hours (L/h) | Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 L/h | 0.0000277778 cm3/ms |
| 1 L/h | 0.0002777778 cm3/ms |
| 10 L/h | 0.0027777778 cm3/ms |
| 60 L/h | 0.0166666667 cm3/ms |
| 100 L/h | 0.0277777778 cm3/ms |
| 1,000 L/h | 0.2777777778 cm3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond to Liter per Hours
0.0002777778 cm3/ms × 3600 = 1.00000008 L/h
0.0002777778 cubic centimeters per millisecond = 1.00000008 liter per hours.
liter per hours = cubic centimeters per millisecond × 3600
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond to Liter per Hours.
Understanding the Liter per Hours (L/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeters per millisecond are in 1 liter per hours?
1 liter per hours equals 0.0002777778 cubic centimeters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert liter per hours to cubic centimeter per millisecond?
Multiply the liter per hours value by 0.0002777777778. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per millisecond back to liter per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per millisecond equals 3,600 liter per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a liter per hours?
Liter per Hours (L/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per millisecond?
Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the liter per hours to cubic centimeter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both liter per hours and cubic centimeter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.0002777777778 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.