Volumetric flow rate.
Liters per Millisecond to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes Converter — L/ms to mm3/min
Convert Liter per Millisecond (L/ms) to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 liter per millisecond = 60,000,000,000 cubic millimeter per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Liters per Millisecond to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1 / 1.66666667e-11.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Liters per Millisecond to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes
Liter per Millisecond and Cubic Millimeter per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeter per minutes = liters per millisecond × 60000000000
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 liter per millisecond equals 1 base unit, and 1 cubic millimeter per minutes equals 1.666667e-11 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct liter per millisecond-to-cubic millimeter per minutes factor of 60000000000.
Simple example
1 L/ms × 60000000000 = 60,000,000,000 mm3/min
1 liter per millisecond = 60,000,000,000 cubic millimeter per minutes.
Real-world example
60 L/ms × 60000000000 = 3.6e+12 mm3/min
60 liters per millisecond = 3.6e+12 cubic millimeter per minutes.
Conversion table
| Liter per Millisecond (L/ms) | Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 L/ms | 6,000,000,000 mm3/min |
| 1 L/ms | 60,000,000,000 mm3/min |
| 10 L/ms | 600,000,000,000 mm3/min |
| 60 L/ms | 3.6e+12 mm3/min |
| 100 L/ms | 6e+12 mm3/min |
| 1,000 L/ms | 6e+13 mm3/min |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Liter per Millisecond
1 mm3/min × 1.666667e-11 = 1.666667e-11 L/ms
1 cubic millimeter per minutes = 1.666667e-11 liters per millisecond.
liters per millisecond = cubic millimeter per minutes × 1.666667e-11
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Liter per Millisecond.
Understanding the Liter per Millisecond (L/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeter per minutes are in 1 liter per millisecond?
1 liter per millisecond equals 60,000,000,000 cubic millimeter per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert liter per millisecond to cubic millimeter per minutes?
Multiply the liter per millisecond value by 60000000000. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per minutes back to liter per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per minutes equals 1.666667e-11 liters per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a liter per millisecond?
Liter per Millisecond (L/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per minutes?
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the liter per millisecond to cubic millimeter per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both liter per millisecond and cubic millimeter per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 60000000000 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.