Volumetric flow rate.
Liters per Millisecond to Cubic yards per Millisecond Converter — L/ms to yd3/ms
Convert Liter per Millisecond (L/ms) to Cubic yard per Millisecond (yd3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 liter per millisecond = 0.0013079506 cubic yard per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Liters per Millisecond to Cubic yards per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1 / 764.554858.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Liters per Millisecond to Cubic yards per Millisecond
Liter per Millisecond and Cubic yard per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic yards per millisecond = liters per millisecond × 0.00130795061931
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 liter per millisecond equals 1 base unit, and 1 cubic yard per millisecond equals 764.554857984 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct liter per millisecond-to-cubic yard per millisecond factor of 0.00130795061931.
Simple example
1 L/ms × 0.001307950619 = 0.0013079506 yd3/ms
1 liter per millisecond = 0.0013079506 cubic yards per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 L/ms × 0.001307950619 = 0.0784770372 yd3/ms
60 liters per millisecond = 0.0784770372 cubic yards per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Liter per Millisecond (L/ms) | Cubic yard per Millisecond (yd3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 L/ms | 0.0001307951 yd3/ms |
| 1 L/ms | 0.0013079506 yd3/ms |
| 10 L/ms | 0.0130795062 yd3/ms |
| 60 L/ms | 0.0784770372 yd3/ms |
| 100 L/ms | 0.1307950619 yd3/ms |
| 1,000 L/ms | 1.307950619 yd3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic yard per Millisecond to Liter per Millisecond
0.0013079506 yd3/ms × 764.554858 = 0.9999999852 L/ms
0.0013079506 cubic yards per millisecond = 0.9999999852 liters per millisecond.
liters per millisecond = cubic yards per millisecond × 764.554857984
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic yard per Millisecond to Liter per Millisecond.
Understanding the Liter per Millisecond (L/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic yard per Millisecond (yd3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic yards per millisecond are in 1 liter per millisecond?
1 liter per millisecond equals 0.0013079506 cubic yards per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert liter per millisecond to cubic yard per millisecond?
Multiply the liter per millisecond value by 0.001307950619. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic yard per millisecond back to liter per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic yard per millisecond equals 764.554858 liters per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a liter per millisecond?
Liter per Millisecond (L/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic yard per millisecond?
Cubic yard per Millisecond (yd3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the liter per millisecond to cubic yard per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both liter per millisecond and cubic yard per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.001307950619 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.