Volumetric flow rate.
Liters per Millisecond to Imperial quart per Hours Converter — L/ms to imp qt/h
Convert Liter per Millisecond (L/ms) to Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 liter per millisecond = 3,167,557.176 imperial quart per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Liters per Millisecond to Imperial quart per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1 / 3.15700694e-7.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Liters per Millisecond to Imperial quart per Hours
Liter per Millisecond and Imperial quart per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quart per hours = liters per millisecond × 3167557.17551
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 liter per millisecond equals 1 base unit, and 1 imperial quart per hours equals 3.157007e-7 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct liter per millisecond-to-imperial quart per hours factor of 3167557.17551.
Simple example
1 L/ms × 3167557.176 = 3,167,557.176 imp qt/h
1 liter per millisecond = 3,167,557.176 imperial quart per hours.
Real-world example
60 L/ms × 3167557.176 = 190,053,430.5 imp qt/h
60 liters per millisecond = 190,053,430.5 imperial quart per hours.
Conversion table
| Liter per Millisecond (L/ms) | Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 L/ms | 316,755.7176 imp qt/h |
| 1 L/ms | 3,167,557.176 imp qt/h |
| 10 L/ms | 31,675,571.76 imp qt/h |
| 60 L/ms | 190,053,430.5 imp qt/h |
| 100 L/ms | 316,755,717.6 imp qt/h |
| 1,000 L/ms | 3,167,557,176 imp qt/h |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Hours to Liter per Millisecond
1 imp qt/h × 3.157007e-7 = 3.157007e-7 L/ms
1 imperial quart per hours = 3.157007e-7 liters per millisecond.
liters per millisecond = imperial quart per hours × 3.157007e-7
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Hours to Liter per Millisecond.
Understanding the Liter per Millisecond (L/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quart per hours are in 1 liter per millisecond?
1 liter per millisecond equals 3,167,557.176 imperial quart per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert liter per millisecond to imperial quart per hours?
Multiply the liter per millisecond value by 3167557.176. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per hours back to liter per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per hours equals 3.157007e-7 liters per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a liter per millisecond?
Liter per Millisecond (L/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per hours?
Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the liter per millisecond to imperial quart per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both liter per millisecond and imperial quart per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 3167557.176 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.