Volumetric flow rate.
Liters per Millisecond to Imperial quart per Seconds Converter — L/ms to imp qt/s
Convert Liter per Millisecond (L/ms) to Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 liter per millisecond = 879.8769932 imperial quart per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Liters per Millisecond to Imperial quart per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1 / 0.0011365225.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Liters per Millisecond to Imperial quart per Seconds
Liter per Millisecond and Imperial quart per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quart per seconds = liters per millisecond × 879.876993196
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 liter per millisecond equals 1 base unit, and 1 imperial quart per seconds equals 0.0011365225 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct liter per millisecond-to-imperial quart per seconds factor of 879.876993196.
Simple example
1 L/ms × 879.8769932 = 879.8769932 imp qt/s
1 liter per millisecond = 879.8769932 imperial quart per seconds.
Real-world example
60 L/ms × 879.8769932 = 52,792.61959 imp qt/s
60 liters per millisecond = 52,792.61959 imperial quart per seconds.
Conversion table
| Liter per Millisecond (L/ms) | Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 L/ms | 87.98769932 imp qt/s |
| 1 L/ms | 879.8769932 imp qt/s |
| 10 L/ms | 8,798.769932 imp qt/s |
| 60 L/ms | 52,792.61959 imp qt/s |
| 100 L/ms | 87,987.69932 imp qt/s |
| 1,000 L/ms | 879,876.9932 imp qt/s |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Seconds to Liter per Millisecond
879.8769932 imp qt/s × 0.0011365225 = 1 L/ms
879.8769932 imperial quart per seconds = 1 liters per millisecond.
liters per millisecond = imperial quart per seconds × 0.0011365225
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Seconds to Liter per Millisecond.
Understanding the Liter per Millisecond (L/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quart per seconds are in 1 liter per millisecond?
1 liter per millisecond equals 879.8769932 imperial quart per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert liter per millisecond to imperial quart per seconds?
Multiply the liter per millisecond value by 879.8769932. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per seconds back to liter per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per seconds equals 0.0011365225 liters per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a liter per millisecond?
Liter per Millisecond (L/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per seconds?
Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the liter per millisecond to imperial quart per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both liter per millisecond and imperial quart per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 879.8769932 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.