Volumetric flow rate.
Liter per Weeks to Cubic Millimeters per Millisecond Converter — L/wk to mm3/ms
Convert Liter per Weeks (L/wk) to Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 liter per weeks = 0.0016534392 cubic millimeter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Liter per Weeks to Cubic Millimeters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-9 / 1e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Liter per Weeks to Cubic Millimeters per Millisecond
Liter per Weeks and Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeters per millisecond = liter per weeks × 0.00165343915344
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 liter per weeks equals 1.653439e-9 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per millisecond equals 0.000001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct liter per weeks-to-cubic millimeter per millisecond factor of 0.00165343915344.
Simple example
1 L/wk × 0.001653439153 = 0.0016534392 mm3/ms
1 liter per weeks = 0.0016534392 cubic millimeters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 L/wk × 0.001653439153 = 0.0992063492 mm3/ms
60 liter per weeks = 0.0992063492 cubic millimeters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Liter per Weeks (L/wk) | Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 L/wk | 0.0001653439 mm3/ms |
| 1 L/wk | 0.0016534392 mm3/ms |
| 10 L/wk | 0.0165343915 mm3/ms |
| 60 L/wk | 0.0992063492 mm3/ms |
| 100 L/wk | 0.1653439153 mm3/ms |
| 1,000 L/wk | 1.653439153 mm3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond to Liter per Weeks
0.0016534392 mm3/ms × 604.8 = 1.000000028 L/wk
0.0016534392 cubic millimeters per millisecond = 1.000000028 liter per weeks.
liter per weeks = cubic millimeters per millisecond × 604.8
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond to Liter per Weeks.
Understanding the Liter per Weeks (L/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeters per millisecond are in 1 liter per weeks?
1 liter per weeks equals 0.0016534392 cubic millimeters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert liter per weeks to cubic millimeter per millisecond?
Multiply the liter per weeks value by 0.001653439153. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per millisecond back to liter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per millisecond equals 604.8 liter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a liter per weeks?
Liter per Weeks (L/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per millisecond?
Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the liter per weeks to cubic millimeter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both liter per weeks and cubic millimeter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.001653439153 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.