Volumetric flow rate.
Liter per Weeks to Imperial pints per Millisecond Converter — L/wk to imp pt/ms
Convert Liter per Weeks (L/wk) to Imperial pint per Millisecond (imp pt/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 liter per weeks = 2.909646e-9 imperial pint per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Liter per Weeks to Imperial pints per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-9 / 0.56826125.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Liter per Weeks to Imperial pints per Millisecond
Liter per Weeks and Imperial pint per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial pints per millisecond = liter per weeks × 2.909646e-9
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 liter per weeks equals 1.653439e-9 base units, and 1 imperial pint per millisecond equals 0.56826125 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct liter per weeks-to-imperial pint per millisecond factor of 2.909646e-9.
Simple example
1 L/wk × 2.909646e-9 = 2.909646e-9 imp pt/ms
1 liter per weeks = 2.909646e-9 imperial pints per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 L/wk × 2.909646e-9 = 1.745788e-7 imp pt/ms
60 liter per weeks = 1.745788e-7 imperial pints per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Liter per Weeks (L/wk) | Imperial pint per Millisecond (imp pt/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 L/wk | 2.909646e-10 imp pt/ms |
| 1 L/wk | 2.909646e-9 imp pt/ms |
| 10 L/wk | 2.909646e-8 imp pt/ms |
| 60 L/wk | 1.745788e-7 imp pt/ms |
| 100 L/wk | 2.909646e-7 imp pt/ms |
| 1,000 L/wk | 0.0000029096 imp pt/ms |
Reverse conversion: Imperial pint per Millisecond to Liter per Weeks
2.909646e-9 imp pt/ms × 343684404 = 0.9999999514 L/wk
2.909646e-9 imperial pints per millisecond = 0.9999999514 liter per weeks.
liter per weeks = imperial pints per millisecond × 343684404
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial pint per Millisecond to Liter per Weeks.
Understanding the Liter per Weeks (L/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial pint per Millisecond (imp pt/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial pints per millisecond are in 1 liter per weeks?
1 liter per weeks equals 2.909646e-9 imperial pints per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert liter per weeks to imperial pint per millisecond?
Multiply the liter per weeks value by 2.909646e-9. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial pint per millisecond back to liter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial pint per millisecond equals 343,684,404 liter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a liter per weeks?
Liter per Weeks (L/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial pint per millisecond?
Imperial pint per Millisecond (imp pt/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the liter per weeks to imperial pint per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both liter per weeks and imperial pint per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 2.909646e-9 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.