Volumetric flow rate.
Liter per Weeks to Imperial quart per Decades Converter — L/wk to imp qt/decade
Convert Liter per Weeks (L/wk) to Imperial quart per Decades (imp qt/decade) using the exact conversion factor (1 liter per weeks = 459.0978181 imperial quart per decades). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Liter per Weeks to Imperial quart per Decades converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-9 / 3.60149643e-12.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Liter per Weeks to Imperial quart per Decades
Liter per Weeks and Imperial quart per Decades both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quart per decades = liter per weeks × 459.097818125
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 liter per weeks equals 1.653439e-9 base units, and 1 imperial quart per decades equals 3.601496e-12 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct liter per weeks-to-imperial quart per decades factor of 459.097818125.
Simple example
1 L/wk × 459.0978181 = 459.0978181 imp qt/decade
1 liter per weeks = 459.0978181 imperial quart per decades.
Real-world example
60 L/wk × 459.0978181 = 27,545.86909 imp qt/decade
60 liter per weeks = 27,545.86909 imperial quart per decades.
Conversion table
| Liter per Weeks (L/wk) | Imperial quart per Decades (imp qt/decade) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 L/wk | 45.90978181 imp qt/decade |
| 1 L/wk | 459.0978181 imp qt/decade |
| 10 L/wk | 4,590.978181 imp qt/decade |
| 60 L/wk | 27,545.86909 imp qt/decade |
| 100 L/wk | 45,909.78181 imp qt/decade |
| 1,000 L/wk | 459,097.8181 imp qt/decade |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Decades to Liter per Weeks
459.0978181 imp qt/decade × 0.002178185041 = 0.9999999999 L/wk
459.0978181 imperial quart per decades = 0.9999999999 liter per weeks.
liter per weeks = imperial quart per decades × 0.00217818504145
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Decades to Liter per Weeks.
Understanding the Liter per Weeks (L/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Decades (imp qt/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quart per decades are in 1 liter per weeks?
1 liter per weeks equals 459.0978181 imperial quart per decades, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert liter per weeks to imperial quart per decades?
Multiply the liter per weeks value by 459.0978181. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per decades back to liter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per decades equals 0.002178185 liter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a liter per weeks?
Liter per Weeks (L/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per decades?
Imperial quart per Decades (imp qt/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the liter per weeks to imperial quart per decades conversion exact?
Yes. Both liter per weeks and imperial quart per decades are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 459.0978181 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.