Volumetric flow rate.
Liter per Weeks to Imperial quarts per Millisecond Converter — L/wk to imp qt/ms
Convert Liter per Weeks (L/wk) to Imperial quart per Millisecond (imp qt/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 liter per weeks = 1.454823e-9 imperial quart per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Liter per Weeks to Imperial quarts per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-9 / 1.1365225.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Liter per Weeks to Imperial quarts per Millisecond
Liter per Weeks and Imperial quart per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quarts per millisecond = liter per weeks × 1.454823e-9
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 liter per weeks equals 1.653439e-9 base units, and 1 imperial quart per millisecond equals 1.1365225 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct liter per weeks-to-imperial quart per millisecond factor of 1.454823e-9.
Simple example
1 L/wk × 1.454823e-9 = 1.454823e-9 imp qt/ms
1 liter per weeks = 1.454823e-9 imperial quarts per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 L/wk × 1.454823e-9 = 8.728938e-8 imp qt/ms
60 liter per weeks = 8.728938e-8 imperial quarts per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Liter per Weeks (L/wk) | Imperial quart per Millisecond (imp qt/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 L/wk | 1.454823e-10 imp qt/ms |
| 1 L/wk | 1.454823e-9 imp qt/ms |
| 10 L/wk | 1.454823e-8 imp qt/ms |
| 60 L/wk | 8.728938e-8 imp qt/ms |
| 100 L/wk | 1.454823e-7 imp qt/ms |
| 1,000 L/wk | 0.0000014548 imp qt/ms |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Millisecond to Liter per Weeks
1.454823e-9 imp qt/ms × 687368808 = 0.9999999514 L/wk
1.454823e-9 imperial quarts per millisecond = 0.9999999514 liter per weeks.
liter per weeks = imperial quarts per millisecond × 687368808
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Millisecond to Liter per Weeks.
Understanding the Liter per Weeks (L/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Millisecond (imp qt/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quarts per millisecond are in 1 liter per weeks?
1 liter per weeks equals 1.454823e-9 imperial quarts per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert liter per weeks to imperial quart per millisecond?
Multiply the liter per weeks value by 1.454823e-9. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per millisecond back to liter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per millisecond equals 687,368,808 liter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a liter per weeks?
Liter per Weeks (L/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per millisecond?
Imperial quart per Millisecond (imp qt/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the liter per weeks to imperial quart per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both liter per weeks and imperial quart per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1.454823e-9 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.