Volumetric flow rate.
Megaliters per Fortnight to Cubic Kilometer per Minutes Converter — ML/fn to km3/min
Convert Megaliter per Fortnight (ML/fn) to Cubic Kilometer per Minutes (km3/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 megaliter per fortnight = 4.960317e-11 cubic kilometer per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Megaliters per Fortnight to Cubic Kilometer per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.0008267195767 / 1.66666667e+7.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Megaliters per Fortnight to Cubic Kilometer per Minutes
Megaliter per Fortnight and Cubic Kilometer per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic kilometer per minutes = megaliters per fortnight × 4.960317e-11
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 megaliter per fortnight equals 0.00082671957672 base units, and 1 cubic kilometer per minutes equals 16666666.6667 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct megaliter per fortnight-to-cubic kilometer per minutes factor of 4.960317e-11.
Simple example
1 ML/fn × 4.960317e-11 = 4.960317e-11 km3/min
1 megaliter per fortnight = 4.960317e-11 cubic kilometer per minutes.
Real-world example
60 ML/fn × 4.960317e-11 = 2.97619e-9 km3/min
60 megaliters per fortnight = 2.97619e-9 cubic kilometer per minutes.
Conversion table
| Megaliter per Fortnight (ML/fn) | Cubic Kilometer per Minutes (km3/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ML/fn | 4.960317e-12 km3/min |
| 1 ML/fn | 4.960317e-11 km3/min |
| 10 ML/fn | 4.960317e-10 km3/min |
| 60 ML/fn | 2.97619e-9 km3/min |
| 100 ML/fn | 4.960317e-9 km3/min |
| 1,000 ML/fn | 4.960317e-8 km3/min |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Kilometer per Minutes to Megaliter per Fortnight
4.960317e-11 km3/min × 20160000000 = 0.9999999072 ML/fn
4.960317e-11 cubic kilometer per minutes = 0.9999999072 megaliters per fortnight.
megaliters per fortnight = cubic kilometer per minutes × 20160000000
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Kilometer per Minutes to Megaliter per Fortnight.
Understanding the Megaliter per Fortnight (ML/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Kilometer per Minutes (km3/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic kilometer per minutes are in 1 megaliter per fortnight?
1 megaliter per fortnight equals 4.960317e-11 cubic kilometer per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert megaliter per fortnight to cubic kilometer per minutes?
Multiply the megaliter per fortnight value by 4.960317e-11. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic kilometer per minutes back to megaliter per fortnight?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic kilometer per minutes equals 20,160,000,000 megaliters per fortnight. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a megaliter per fortnight?
Megaliter per Fortnight (ML/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic kilometer per minutes?
Cubic Kilometer per Minutes (km3/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the megaliter per fortnight to cubic kilometer per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both megaliter per fortnight and cubic kilometer per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 4.960317e-11 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.