Volumetric flow rate.
Megaliters per Fortnight to Quarts per Millisecond Converter — ML/fn to qt/ms
Convert Megaliter per Fortnight (ML/fn) to Quart per Millisecond (qt/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 megaliter per fortnight = 0.0008735848 quart per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Megaliters per Fortnight to Quarts per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.0008267195767 / 0.946352946.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Megaliters per Fortnight to Quarts per Millisecond
Megaliter per Fortnight and Quart per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
quarts per millisecond = megaliters per fortnight × 0.000873584829227
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 megaliter per fortnight equals 0.00082671957672 base units, and 1 quart per millisecond equals 0.946352946 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct megaliter per fortnight-to-quart per millisecond factor of 0.000873584829227.
Simple example
1 ML/fn × 0.0008735848292 = 0.0008735848 qt/ms
1 megaliter per fortnight = 0.0008735848 quarts per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 ML/fn × 0.0008735848292 = 0.0524150898 qt/ms
60 megaliters per fortnight = 0.0524150898 quarts per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Megaliter per Fortnight (ML/fn) | Quart per Millisecond (qt/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ML/fn | 0.0000873585 qt/ms |
| 1 ML/fn | 0.0008735848 qt/ms |
| 10 ML/fn | 0.0087358483 qt/ms |
| 60 ML/fn | 0.0524150898 qt/ms |
| 100 ML/fn | 0.0873584829 qt/ms |
| 1,000 ML/fn | 0.8735848292 qt/ms |
Reverse conversion: Quart per Millisecond to Megaliter per Fortnight
0.0008735848 qt/ms × 1144.708523 = 0.9999999665 ML/fn
0.0008735848 quarts per millisecond = 0.9999999665 megaliters per fortnight.
megaliters per fortnight = quarts per millisecond × 1144.70852348
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Quart per Millisecond to Megaliter per Fortnight.
Understanding the Megaliter per Fortnight (ML/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Quart per Millisecond (qt/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many quarts per millisecond are in 1 megaliter per fortnight?
1 megaliter per fortnight equals 0.0008735848 quarts per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert megaliter per fortnight to quart per millisecond?
Multiply the megaliter per fortnight value by 0.0008735848292. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert quart per millisecond back to megaliter per fortnight?
Use the reverse factor: 1 quart per millisecond equals 1,144.708523 megaliters per fortnight. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a megaliter per fortnight?
Megaliter per Fortnight (ML/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a quart per millisecond?
Quart per Millisecond (qt/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the megaliter per fortnight to quart per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both megaliter per fortnight and quart per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.0008735848292 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.