Volumetric flow rate.
Megaliters per Millisecond to Cubic feet per Millisecond Converter — ML/ms to ft3/ms
Convert Megaliter per Millisecond (ML/ms) to Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 megaliter per millisecond = 35,314.66672 cubic foot per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Megaliters per Millisecond to Cubic feet per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1e+6 / 28.31684659.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Megaliters per Millisecond to Cubic feet per Millisecond
Megaliter per Millisecond and Cubic foot per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic feet per millisecond = megaliters per millisecond × 35314.6667215
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 megaliter per millisecond equals 1000000 base units, and 1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 28.316846592 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct megaliter per millisecond-to-cubic foot per millisecond factor of 35314.6667215.
Simple example
1 ML/ms × 35314.66672 = 35,314.66672 ft3/ms
1 megaliter per millisecond = 35,314.66672 cubic feet per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 ML/ms × 35314.66672 = 2,118,880.003 ft3/ms
60 megaliters per millisecond = 2,118,880.003 cubic feet per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Megaliter per Millisecond (ML/ms) | Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ML/ms | 3,531.466672 ft3/ms |
| 1 ML/ms | 35,314.66672 ft3/ms |
| 10 ML/ms | 353,146.6672 ft3/ms |
| 60 ML/ms | 2,118,880.003 ft3/ms |
| 100 ML/ms | 3,531,466.672 ft3/ms |
| 1,000 ML/ms | 35,314,666.72 ft3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic foot per Millisecond to Megaliter per Millisecond
1 ft3/ms × 0.00002831684659 = 0.0000283168 ML/ms
1 cubic foot per millisecond = 0.0000283168 megaliters per millisecond.
megaliters per millisecond = cubic feet per millisecond × 0.000028316846592
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic foot per Millisecond to Megaliter per Millisecond.
Understanding the Megaliter per Millisecond (ML/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic feet per millisecond are in 1 megaliter per millisecond?
1 megaliter per millisecond equals 35,314.66672 cubic feet per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert megaliter per millisecond to cubic foot per millisecond?
Multiply the megaliter per millisecond value by 35314.66672. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic foot per millisecond back to megaliter per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 0.0000283168 megaliters per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a megaliter per millisecond?
Megaliter per Millisecond (ML/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic foot per millisecond?
Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the megaliter per millisecond to cubic foot per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both megaliter per millisecond and cubic foot per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 35314.66672 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.