Volumetric flow rate.
Megaliter per Seconds to Cubic yards per Millisecond Converter — ML/s to yd3/ms
Convert Megaliter per Seconds (ML/s) to Cubic yard per Millisecond (yd3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 megaliter per seconds = 1.307950619 cubic yard per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Megaliter per Seconds to Cubic yards per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1000 / 764.554858.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Megaliter per Seconds to Cubic yards per Millisecond
Megaliter per Seconds and Cubic yard per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic yards per millisecond = megaliter per seconds × 1.30795061931
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 megaliter per seconds equals 1000 base units, and 1 cubic yard per millisecond equals 764.554857984 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct megaliter per seconds-to-cubic yard per millisecond factor of 1.30795061931.
Simple example
1 ML/s × 1.307950619 = 1.307950619 yd3/ms
1 megaliter per seconds = 1.307950619 cubic yards per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 ML/s × 1.307950619 = 78.47703716 yd3/ms
60 megaliter per seconds = 78.47703716 cubic yards per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Megaliter per Seconds (ML/s) | Cubic yard per Millisecond (yd3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ML/s | 0.1307950619 yd3/ms |
| 1 ML/s | 1.307950619 yd3/ms |
| 10 ML/s | 13.07950619 yd3/ms |
| 60 ML/s | 78.47703716 yd3/ms |
| 100 ML/s | 130.7950619 yd3/ms |
| 1,000 ML/s | 1,307.950619 yd3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic yard per Millisecond to Megaliter per Seconds
1.307950619 yd3/ms × 0.764554858 = 0.9999999998 ML/s
1.307950619 cubic yards per millisecond = 0.9999999998 megaliter per seconds.
megaliter per seconds = cubic yards per millisecond × 0.764554857984
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic yard per Millisecond to Megaliter per Seconds.
Understanding the Megaliter per Seconds (ML/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic yard per Millisecond (yd3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic yards per millisecond are in 1 megaliter per seconds?
1 megaliter per seconds equals 1.307950619 cubic yards per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert megaliter per seconds to cubic yard per millisecond?
Multiply the megaliter per seconds value by 1.307950619. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic yard per millisecond back to megaliter per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic yard per millisecond equals 0.764554858 megaliter per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a megaliter per seconds?
Megaliter per Seconds (ML/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic yard per millisecond?
Cubic yard per Millisecond (yd3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the megaliter per seconds to cubic yard per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both megaliter per seconds and cubic yard per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1.307950619 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.