Volumetric flow rate.
Megaliter per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds Converter — ML/wk to cm3/s
Convert Megaliter per Weeks (ML/wk) to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 megaliter per weeks = 1,653.439153 cubic centimeter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Megaliter per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.001653439153 / 1e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Megaliter per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds
Megaliter per Weeks and Cubic Centimeter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeter per seconds = megaliter per weeks × 1653.43915344
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 megaliter per weeks equals 0.00165343915344 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per seconds equals 0.000001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct megaliter per weeks-to-cubic centimeter per seconds factor of 1653.43915344.
Simple example
1 ML/wk × 1653.439153 = 1,653.439153 cm3/s
1 megaliter per weeks = 1,653.439153 cubic centimeter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 ML/wk × 1653.439153 = 99,206.34921 cm3/s
60 megaliter per weeks = 99,206.34921 cubic centimeter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Megaliter per Weeks (ML/wk) | Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ML/wk | 165.3439153 cm3/s |
| 1 ML/wk | 1,653.439153 cm3/s |
| 10 ML/wk | 16,534.39153 cm3/s |
| 60 ML/wk | 99,206.34921 cm3/s |
| 100 ML/wk | 165,343.9153 cm3/s |
| 1,000 ML/wk | 1,653,439.153 cm3/s |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Megaliter per Weeks
1 cm3/s × 0.0006048 = 0.0006048 ML/wk
1 cubic centimeter per seconds = 0.0006048 megaliter per weeks.
megaliter per weeks = cubic centimeter per seconds × 0.0006048
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Megaliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Megaliter per Weeks (ML/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeter per seconds are in 1 megaliter per weeks?
1 megaliter per weeks equals 1,653.439153 cubic centimeter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert megaliter per weeks to cubic centimeter per seconds?
Multiply the megaliter per weeks value by 1653.439153. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per seconds back to megaliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per seconds equals 0.0006048 megaliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a megaliter per weeks?
Megaliter per Weeks (ML/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per seconds?
Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the megaliter per weeks to cubic centimeter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both megaliter per weeks and cubic centimeter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1653.439153 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.