Volumetric flow rate.
Megaliter per Weeks to Cubic feet per Millisecond Converter — ML/wk to ft3/ms
Convert Megaliter per Weeks (ML/wk) to Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 megaliter per weeks = 0.0000583907 cubic foot per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Megaliter per Weeks to Cubic feet per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.001653439153 / 28.31684659.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Megaliter per Weeks to Cubic feet per Millisecond
Megaliter per Weeks and Cubic foot per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic feet per millisecond = megaliter per weeks × 0.000058390652648
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 megaliter per weeks equals 0.00165343915344 base units, and 1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 28.316846592 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct megaliter per weeks-to-cubic foot per millisecond factor of 0.000058390652648.
Simple example
1 ML/wk × 0.00005839065265 = 0.0000583907 ft3/ms
1 megaliter per weeks = 0.0000583907 cubic feet per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 ML/wk × 0.00005839065265 = 0.0035034392 ft3/ms
60 megaliter per weeks = 0.0035034392 cubic feet per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Megaliter per Weeks (ML/wk) | Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ML/wk | 0.0000058391 ft3/ms |
| 1 ML/wk | 0.0000583907 ft3/ms |
| 10 ML/wk | 0.0005839065 ft3/ms |
| 60 ML/wk | 0.0035034392 ft3/ms |
| 100 ML/wk | 0.0058390653 ft3/ms |
| 1,000 ML/wk | 0.0583906527 ft3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic foot per Millisecond to Megaliter per Weeks
0.0000583907 ft3/ms × 17126.02882 = 1.000000811 ML/wk
0.0000583907 cubic feet per millisecond = 1.000000811 megaliter per weeks.
megaliter per weeks = cubic feet per millisecond × 17126.0288188
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic foot per Millisecond to Megaliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Megaliter per Weeks (ML/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic feet per millisecond are in 1 megaliter per weeks?
1 megaliter per weeks equals 0.0000583907 cubic feet per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert megaliter per weeks to cubic foot per millisecond?
Multiply the megaliter per weeks value by 0.00005839065265. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic foot per millisecond back to megaliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 17,126.02882 megaliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a megaliter per weeks?
Megaliter per Weeks (ML/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic foot per millisecond?
Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the megaliter per weeks to cubic foot per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both megaliter per weeks and cubic foot per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00005839065265 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.