Volumetric flow rate.
Megaliter per Weeks to Imperial quarts per Millisecond Converter — ML/wk to imp qt/ms
Convert Megaliter per Weeks (ML/wk) to Imperial quart per Millisecond (imp qt/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 megaliter per weeks = 0.0014548231 imperial quart per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Megaliter per Weeks to Imperial quarts per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.001653439153 / 1.1365225.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Megaliter per Weeks to Imperial quarts per Millisecond
Megaliter per Weeks and Imperial quart per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quarts per millisecond = megaliter per weeks × 0.00145482307076
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 megaliter per weeks equals 0.00165343915344 base units, and 1 imperial quart per millisecond equals 1.1365225 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct megaliter per weeks-to-imperial quart per millisecond factor of 0.00145482307076.
Simple example
1 ML/wk × 0.001454823071 = 0.0014548231 imp qt/ms
1 megaliter per weeks = 0.0014548231 imperial quarts per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 ML/wk × 0.001454823071 = 0.0872893843 imp qt/ms
60 megaliter per weeks = 0.0872893843 imperial quarts per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Megaliter per Weeks (ML/wk) | Imperial quart per Millisecond (imp qt/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ML/wk | 0.0001454823 imp qt/ms |
| 1 ML/wk | 0.0014548231 imp qt/ms |
| 10 ML/wk | 0.0145482307 imp qt/ms |
| 60 ML/wk | 0.0872893843 imp qt/ms |
| 100 ML/wk | 0.1454823071 imp qt/ms |
| 1,000 ML/wk | 1.454823071 imp qt/ms |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Millisecond to Megaliter per Weeks
0.0014548231 imp qt/ms × 687.368808 = 1.00000002 ML/wk
0.0014548231 imperial quarts per millisecond = 1.00000002 megaliter per weeks.
megaliter per weeks = imperial quarts per millisecond × 687.368808
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Millisecond to Megaliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Megaliter per Weeks (ML/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Millisecond (imp qt/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quarts per millisecond are in 1 megaliter per weeks?
1 megaliter per weeks equals 0.0014548231 imperial quarts per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert megaliter per weeks to imperial quart per millisecond?
Multiply the megaliter per weeks value by 0.001454823071. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per millisecond back to megaliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per millisecond equals 687.368808 megaliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a megaliter per weeks?
Megaliter per Weeks (ML/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per millisecond?
Imperial quart per Millisecond (imp qt/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the megaliter per weeks to imperial quart per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both megaliter per weeks and imperial quart per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.001454823071 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.