Volumetric flow rate.
Megaliter per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Seconds Converter — ML/wk to metric tsp/s
Convert Megaliter per Weeks (ML/wk) to Metric teaspoon per Seconds (metric tsp/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 megaliter per weeks = 330.6878307 metric teaspoon per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Megaliter per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.001653439153 / 5e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Megaliter per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Seconds
Megaliter per Weeks and Metric teaspoon per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
metric teaspoon per seconds = megaliter per weeks × 330.687830688
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 megaliter per weeks equals 0.00165343915344 base units, and 1 metric teaspoon per seconds equals 0.000005 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct megaliter per weeks-to-metric teaspoon per seconds factor of 330.687830688.
Simple example
1 ML/wk × 330.6878307 = 330.6878307 metric tsp/s
1 megaliter per weeks = 330.6878307 metric teaspoon per seconds.
Real-world example
60 ML/wk × 330.6878307 = 19,841.26984 metric tsp/s
60 megaliter per weeks = 19,841.26984 metric teaspoon per seconds.
Conversion table
| Megaliter per Weeks (ML/wk) | Metric teaspoon per Seconds (metric tsp/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ML/wk | 33.06878307 metric tsp/s |
| 1 ML/wk | 330.6878307 metric tsp/s |
| 10 ML/wk | 3,306.878307 metric tsp/s |
| 60 ML/wk | 19,841.26984 metric tsp/s |
| 100 ML/wk | 33,068.78307 metric tsp/s |
| 1,000 ML/wk | 330,687.8307 metric tsp/s |
Reverse conversion: Metric teaspoon per Seconds to Megaliter per Weeks
330.6878307 metric tsp/s × 0.003024 = 1 ML/wk
330.6878307 metric teaspoon per seconds = 1 megaliter per weeks.
megaliter per weeks = metric teaspoon per seconds × 0.003024
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Metric teaspoon per Seconds to Megaliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Megaliter per Weeks (ML/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Metric teaspoon per Seconds (metric tsp/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many metric teaspoon per seconds are in 1 megaliter per weeks?
1 megaliter per weeks equals 330.6878307 metric teaspoon per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert megaliter per weeks to metric teaspoon per seconds?
Multiply the megaliter per weeks value by 330.6878307. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert metric teaspoon per seconds back to megaliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 metric teaspoon per seconds equals 0.003024 megaliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a megaliter per weeks?
Megaliter per Weeks (ML/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a metric teaspoon per seconds?
Metric teaspoon per Seconds (metric tsp/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the megaliter per weeks to metric teaspoon per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both megaliter per weeks and metric teaspoon per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 330.6878307 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.