Volumetric flow rate.
Microliters per Millisecond to Bushel per Seconds Converter — uL/ms to bu/s
Convert Microliter per Millisecond (uL/ms) to Bushel per Seconds (bu/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 microliter per millisecond = 0.0000283776 bushel per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Microliters per Millisecond to Bushel per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1e-6 / 0.03523907017.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Microliters per Millisecond to Bushel per Seconds
Microliter per Millisecond and Bushel per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
bushel per seconds = microliters per millisecond × 0.0000283775932584
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 microliter per millisecond equals 0.000001 base units, and 1 bushel per seconds equals 0.0352390701669 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct microliter per millisecond-to-bushel per seconds factor of 0.0000283775932584.
Simple example
1 uL/ms × 0.00002837759326 = 0.0000283776 bu/s
1 microliter per millisecond = 0.0000283776 bushel per seconds.
Real-world example
60 uL/ms × 0.00002837759326 = 0.0017026556 bu/s
60 microliters per millisecond = 0.0017026556 bushel per seconds.
Conversion table
| Microliter per Millisecond (uL/ms) | Bushel per Seconds (bu/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 uL/ms | 0.0000028378 bu/s |
| 1 uL/ms | 0.0000283776 bu/s |
| 10 uL/ms | 0.0002837759 bu/s |
| 60 uL/ms | 0.0017026556 bu/s |
| 100 uL/ms | 0.0028377593 bu/s |
| 1,000 uL/ms | 0.0283775933 bu/s |
Reverse conversion: Bushel per Seconds to Microliter per Millisecond
0.0000283776 bu/s × 35239.07017 = 1.000000238 uL/ms
0.0000283776 bushel per seconds = 1.000000238 microliters per millisecond.
microliters per millisecond = bushel per seconds × 35239.0701669
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Bushel per Seconds to Microliter per Millisecond.
Understanding the Microliter per Millisecond (uL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Bushel per Seconds (bu/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many bushel per seconds are in 1 microliter per millisecond?
1 microliter per millisecond equals 0.0000283776 bushel per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert microliter per millisecond to bushel per seconds?
Multiply the microliter per millisecond value by 0.00002837759326. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert bushel per seconds back to microliter per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 bushel per seconds equals 35,239.07017 microliters per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a microliter per millisecond?
Microliter per Millisecond (uL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a bushel per seconds?
Bushel per Seconds (bu/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the microliter per millisecond to bushel per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both microliter per millisecond and bushel per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00002837759326 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.