Volumetric flow rate.
Microliters per Millisecond to Centiliters per Fortnight Converter — uL/ms to cL/fn
Convert Microliter per Millisecond (uL/ms) to Centiliter per Fortnight (cL/fn) using the exact conversion factor (1 microliter per millisecond = 120,960 centiliter per fortnight). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Microliters per Millisecond to Centiliters per Fortnight converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1e-6 / 8.26719577e-12.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Microliters per Millisecond to Centiliters per Fortnight
Microliter per Millisecond and Centiliter per Fortnight both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
centiliters per fortnight = microliters per millisecond × 120960
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 microliter per millisecond equals 0.000001 base units, and 1 centiliter per fortnight equals 8.267196e-12 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct microliter per millisecond-to-centiliter per fortnight factor of 120960.
Simple example
1 uL/ms × 120960 = 120,960 cL/fn
1 microliter per millisecond = 120,960 centiliters per fortnight.
Real-world example
60 uL/ms × 120960 = 7,257,600 cL/fn
60 microliters per millisecond = 7,257,600 centiliters per fortnight.
Conversion table
| Microliter per Millisecond (uL/ms) | Centiliter per Fortnight (cL/fn) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 uL/ms | 12,096 cL/fn |
| 1 uL/ms | 120,960 cL/fn |
| 10 uL/ms | 1,209,600 cL/fn |
| 60 uL/ms | 7,257,600 cL/fn |
| 100 uL/ms | 12,096,000 cL/fn |
| 1,000 uL/ms | 120,960,000 cL/fn |
Reverse conversion: Centiliter per Fortnight to Microliter per Millisecond
1 cL/fn × 0.000008267195767 = 0.0000082672 uL/ms
1 centiliter per fortnight = 0.0000082672 microliters per millisecond.
microliters per millisecond = centiliters per fortnight × 0.0000082671957672
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Centiliter per Fortnight to Microliter per Millisecond.
Understanding the Microliter per Millisecond (uL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Centiliter per Fortnight (cL/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many centiliters per fortnight are in 1 microliter per millisecond?
1 microliter per millisecond equals 120,960 centiliters per fortnight, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert microliter per millisecond to centiliter per fortnight?
Multiply the microliter per millisecond value by 120960. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert centiliter per fortnight back to microliter per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 centiliter per fortnight equals 0.0000082672 microliters per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a microliter per millisecond?
Microliter per Millisecond (uL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a centiliter per fortnight?
Centiliter per Fortnight (cL/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the microliter per millisecond to centiliter per fortnight conversion exact?
Yes. Both microliter per millisecond and centiliter per fortnight are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 120960 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.