Volumetric flow rate.
Microliters per Millisecond to Fluid ounce per Minutes Converter — uL/ms to fl oz/min
Convert Microliter per Millisecond (uL/ms) to Fluid ounce per Minutes (fl oz/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 microliter per millisecond = 2.028841362 fluid ounce per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Microliters per Millisecond to Fluid ounce per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1e-6 / 4.92892159e-7.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Microliters per Millisecond to Fluid ounce per Minutes
Microliter per Millisecond and Fluid ounce per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
fluid ounce per minutes = microliters per millisecond × 2.02884136211
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 microliter per millisecond equals 0.000001 base units, and 1 fluid ounce per minutes equals 4.928922e-7 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct microliter per millisecond-to-fluid ounce per minutes factor of 2.02884136211.
Simple example
1 uL/ms × 2.028841362 = 2.028841362 fl oz/min
1 microliter per millisecond = 2.028841362 fluid ounce per minutes.
Real-world example
60 uL/ms × 2.028841362 = 121.7304817 fl oz/min
60 microliters per millisecond = 121.7304817 fluid ounce per minutes.
Conversion table
| Microliter per Millisecond (uL/ms) | Fluid ounce per Minutes (fl oz/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 uL/ms | 0.2028841362 fl oz/min |
| 1 uL/ms | 2.028841362 fl oz/min |
| 10 uL/ms | 20.28841362 fl oz/min |
| 60 uL/ms | 121.7304817 fl oz/min |
| 100 uL/ms | 202.8841362 fl oz/min |
| 1,000 uL/ms | 2,028.841362 fl oz/min |
Reverse conversion: Fluid ounce per Minutes to Microliter per Millisecond
2.028841362 fl oz/min × 0.4928921594 = 0.9999999999 uL/ms
2.028841362 fluid ounce per minutes = 0.9999999999 microliters per millisecond.
microliters per millisecond = fluid ounce per minutes × 0.492892159375
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Fluid ounce per Minutes to Microliter per Millisecond.
Understanding the Microliter per Millisecond (uL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Fluid ounce per Minutes (fl oz/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many fluid ounce per minutes are in 1 microliter per millisecond?
1 microliter per millisecond equals 2.028841362 fluid ounce per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert microliter per millisecond to fluid ounce per minutes?
Multiply the microliter per millisecond value by 2.028841362. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert fluid ounce per minutes back to microliter per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 fluid ounce per minutes equals 0.4928921594 microliters per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a microliter per millisecond?
Microliter per Millisecond (uL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a fluid ounce per minutes?
Fluid ounce per Minutes (fl oz/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the microliter per millisecond to fluid ounce per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both microliter per millisecond and fluid ounce per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 2.028841362 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.