Volumetric flow rate.
Microliters per Millisecond to Imperial quart per Hours Converter — uL/ms to imp qt/h
Convert Microliter per Millisecond (uL/ms) to Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 microliter per millisecond = 3.167557176 imperial quart per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Microliters per Millisecond to Imperial quart per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1e-6 / 3.15700694e-7.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Microliters per Millisecond to Imperial quart per Hours
Microliter per Millisecond and Imperial quart per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quart per hours = microliters per millisecond × 3.16755717551
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 microliter per millisecond equals 0.000001 base units, and 1 imperial quart per hours equals 3.157007e-7 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct microliter per millisecond-to-imperial quart per hours factor of 3.16755717551.
Simple example
1 uL/ms × 3.167557176 = 3.167557176 imp qt/h
1 microliter per millisecond = 3.167557176 imperial quart per hours.
Real-world example
60 uL/ms × 3.167557176 = 190.0534305 imp qt/h
60 microliters per millisecond = 190.0534305 imperial quart per hours.
Conversion table
| Microliter per Millisecond (uL/ms) | Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 uL/ms | 0.3167557176 imp qt/h |
| 1 uL/ms | 3.167557176 imp qt/h |
| 10 uL/ms | 31.67557176 imp qt/h |
| 60 uL/ms | 190.0534305 imp qt/h |
| 100 uL/ms | 316.7557176 imp qt/h |
| 1,000 uL/ms | 3,167.557176 imp qt/h |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Hours to Microliter per Millisecond
3.167557176 imp qt/h × 0.3157006944 = 1 uL/ms
3.167557176 imperial quart per hours = 1 microliters per millisecond.
microliters per millisecond = imperial quart per hours × 0.315700694444
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Hours to Microliter per Millisecond.
Understanding the Microliter per Millisecond (uL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quart per hours are in 1 microliter per millisecond?
1 microliter per millisecond equals 3.167557176 imperial quart per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert microliter per millisecond to imperial quart per hours?
Multiply the microliter per millisecond value by 3.167557176. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per hours back to microliter per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per hours equals 0.3157006944 microliters per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a microliter per millisecond?
Microliter per Millisecond (uL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per hours?
Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the microliter per millisecond to imperial quart per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both microliter per millisecond and imperial quart per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 3.167557176 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.