Volumetric flow rate.
Microliter per Minutes to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds Converter — uL/min to mm3/s
Convert Microliter per Minutes (uL/min) to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 microliter per minutes = 0.0166666667 cubic millimeter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Microliter per Minutes to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.66666667e-11 / 1e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Microliter per Minutes to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds
Microliter per Minutes and Cubic Millimeter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeter per seconds = microliter per minutes × 0.0166666666667
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 microliter per minutes equals 1.666667e-11 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per seconds equals 1e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct microliter per minutes-to-cubic millimeter per seconds factor of 0.0166666666667.
Simple example
1 uL/min × 0.01666666667 = 0.0166666667 mm3/s
1 microliter per minutes = 0.0166666667 cubic millimeter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 uL/min × 0.01666666667 = 1 mm3/s
60 microliter per minutes = 1 cubic millimeter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Microliter per Minutes (uL/min) | Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 uL/min | 0.0016666667 mm3/s |
| 1 uL/min | 0.0166666667 mm3/s |
| 10 uL/min | 0.1666666667 mm3/s |
| 60 uL/min | 1 mm3/s |
| 100 uL/min | 1.666666667 mm3/s |
| 1,000 uL/min | 16.66666667 mm3/s |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Microliter per Minutes
0.0166666667 mm3/s × 60 = 1.000000002 uL/min
0.0166666667 cubic millimeter per seconds = 1.000000002 microliter per minutes.
microliter per minutes = cubic millimeter per seconds × 60
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Microliter per Minutes.
Understanding the Microliter per Minutes (uL/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeter per seconds are in 1 microliter per minutes?
1 microliter per minutes equals 0.0166666667 cubic millimeter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert microliter per minutes to cubic millimeter per seconds?
Multiply the microliter per minutes value by 0.01666666667. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per seconds back to microliter per minutes?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per seconds equals 60 microliter per minutes. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a microliter per minutes?
Microliter per Minutes (uL/min) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per seconds?
Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the microliter per minutes to cubic millimeter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both microliter per minutes and cubic millimeter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.01666666667 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.