Volumetric flow rate.
Microliter per Minutes to Fluid ounce per Seconds Converter — uL/min to fl oz/s
Convert Microliter per Minutes (uL/min) to Fluid ounce per Seconds (fl oz/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 microliter per minutes = 5.63567e-7 fluid ounce per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Microliter per Minutes to Fluid ounce per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.66666667e-11 / 2.95735296e-5.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Microliter per Minutes to Fluid ounce per Seconds
Microliter per Minutes and Fluid ounce per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
fluid ounce per seconds = microliter per minutes × 5.63567e-7
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 microliter per minutes equals 1.666667e-11 base units, and 1 fluid ounce per seconds equals 0.0000295735295625 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct microliter per minutes-to-fluid ounce per seconds factor of 5.63567e-7.
Simple example
1 uL/min × 5.63567e-7 = 5.63567e-7 fl oz/s
1 microliter per minutes = 5.63567e-7 fluid ounce per seconds.
Real-world example
60 uL/min × 5.63567e-7 = 0.000033814 fl oz/s
60 microliter per minutes = 0.000033814 fluid ounce per seconds.
Conversion table
| Microliter per Minutes (uL/min) | Fluid ounce per Seconds (fl oz/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 uL/min | 5.63567e-8 fl oz/s |
| 1 uL/min | 5.63567e-7 fl oz/s |
| 10 uL/min | 0.0000056357 fl oz/s |
| 60 uL/min | 0.000033814 fl oz/s |
| 100 uL/min | 0.0000563567 fl oz/s |
| 1,000 uL/min | 0.000563567 fl oz/s |
Reverse conversion: Fluid ounce per Seconds to Microliter per Minutes
5.63567e-7 fl oz/s × 1774411.774 = 0.9999999201 uL/min
5.63567e-7 fluid ounce per seconds = 0.9999999201 microliter per minutes.
microliter per minutes = fluid ounce per seconds × 1774411.77375
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Fluid ounce per Seconds to Microliter per Minutes.
Understanding the Microliter per Minutes (uL/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Fluid ounce per Seconds (fl oz/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many fluid ounce per seconds are in 1 microliter per minutes?
1 microliter per minutes equals 5.63567e-7 fluid ounce per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert microliter per minutes to fluid ounce per seconds?
Multiply the microliter per minutes value by 5.63567e-7. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert fluid ounce per seconds back to microliter per minutes?
Use the reverse factor: 1 fluid ounce per seconds equals 1,774,411.774 microliter per minutes. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a microliter per minutes?
Microliter per Minutes (uL/min) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a fluid ounce per seconds?
Fluid ounce per Seconds (fl oz/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the microliter per minutes to fluid ounce per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both microliter per minutes and fluid ounce per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 5.63567e-7 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.