Milliliter per Days to Cubic foot per Hours Converter — mL/d to ft3/h

Convert Milliliter per Days (mL/d) to Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 milliliter per days = 0.0000014714 cubic foot per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.

Milliliter per Days to Cubic foot per Hours converter

Converter

Flow Rate Converter

Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.

Result 1 milliliter per days = 0.0000014714 cubic foot per hours
Advertisement Converter ad slot

Reserved below the result so the calculator remains usable.

From definition

Volumetric flow rate.

To definition

Volumetric flow rate.

Formula

Result = input x 1.15740741e-11 / 7.86579072e-6.

Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.

Advertisement Ad slot: content top (728x90)

Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.

About Converting Milliliter per Days to Cubic foot per Hours

Milliliter per Days and Cubic foot per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.

Formula

cubic foot per hours = milliliter per days × 0.00000147144444673

This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 milliliter per days equals 1.157407e-11 base units, and 1 cubic foot per hours equals 0.00000786579072 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct milliliter per days-to-cubic foot per hours factor of 0.00000147144444673.

Simple example

1 mL/d × 0.000001471444447 = 0.0000014714 ft3/h

1 milliliter per days = 0.0000014714 cubic foot per hours.

Real-world example

60 mL/d × 0.000001471444447 = 0.0000882867 ft3/h

60 milliliter per days = 0.0000882867 cubic foot per hours.

Conversion table

Milliliter per Days (mL/d)Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h)
0.1 mL/d1.471444e-7 ft3/h
1 mL/d0.0000014714 ft3/h
10 mL/d0.0000147144 ft3/h
60 mL/d0.0000882867 ft3/h
100 mL/d0.0001471444 ft3/h
1,000 mL/d0.0014714444 ft3/h

Reverse conversion: Cubic foot per Hours to Milliliter per Days

0.0000014714 ft3/h × 679604.3182 = 0.9999697938 mL/d

0.0000014714 cubic foot per hours = 0.9999697938 milliliter per days.

milliliter per days = cubic foot per hours × 679604.318208

For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic foot per Hours to Milliliter per Days.

Understanding the Milliliter per Days (mL/d)

Volumetric flow rate.

Understanding the Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h)

Volumetric flow rate.

Advertisement Ad slot: content middle (728x90)

Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.

Frequently asked questions

How many cubic foot per hours are in 1 milliliter per days?

1 milliliter per days equals 0.0000014714 cubic foot per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.

How do I convert milliliter per days to cubic foot per hours?

Multiply the milliliter per days value by 0.000001471444447. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.

How do I convert cubic foot per hours back to milliliter per days?

Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic foot per hours equals 679,604.3182 milliliter per days. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.

What is a milliliter per days?

Milliliter per Days (mL/d) is a unit of flow rate.

What is a cubic foot per hours?

Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h) is a unit of flow rate.

Is the milliliter per days to cubic foot per hours conversion exact?

Yes. Both milliliter per days and cubic foot per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.000001471444447 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.

What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?

Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.